An artifact-robust framework for measuring tCS effects during stimulation
Noury, N.; Damiani, F.; Siegel, M.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTranscranial current stimulation (tCS) is a promising technique to non-invasively modulate human brain activity. However, stimulation artifacts in EEG and MEG recordings severely hinder the study of its online effects. ApproachHere, we introduce a new approach to account for these artifacts. The approach rests on two key ideas. First, we focus on interactions of tCS with intrinsic brain activity, which are absent for tCS artifacts. Second, rather than removing artifacts, we compare composite signals that share similar artifacts but potentially differ in the interaction of tCS with intrinsic brain activity. We follow a simple logic: if tCS does not interact with intrinsic brain activity, then neural activity during simultaneous sensory stimulation and tCS should equal the linear superposition of the neural effects of each applied alone. Any deviation from this prediction provides evidence for a neural interaction. Main resultsWe tested this approach in a proof-of-principle MEG study, applying 10 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) during rest and during a 10 Hz visual flicker. We compared neural activity during simultaneous stimulation with that predicted by the linear superposition of flicker and tACS alone and found a phase-dependent interaction between tACS and flicker-evoked brain activity. SignificanceOur work establishes a novel approach to investigate online effects of tCS and suggests a state-dependent interaction of tACS with human brain activity.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Working memory enhancement using real-time phase-tuned transcranial alternating current stimulation 97%
- Phase-specific manipulation of neural oscillatory activity by transcranial alternating current stimulation 97%
- Approximating Signal Sources in Stereo-EEG Single Pulse Electrical Stimulation using Re-referencing and Spectral Analysis 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Extracting Reproducible Components from Electroencephalographic Responses to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with Group Task-Related Component Analysis 96%
- Distinct and complementary mechanisms of oscillatory and aperiodic alpha activity in visuospatial attention 95%
- Supramodal and modality-specific neural information supports multi-feature prediction errors across cortical levels 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.