Back

Microbial-inspired antidotes to repurpose toxic compounds as antibiotics

Samad, T. S.; Ngambenjawong, C.; Ko, H.; Patel, S.; DeAgazio, C.; Fleming, H. E.; Bhatia, S. N.

2025-10-31 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.10.31.685078 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Antibiotic-resistant (AMR) bacterial infections are a major global health threat. Despite the critical need for new antimicrobials, progress is constrained by protracted development timelines, as well as the requirement for chemical novelty to avoid cross-resistance. Although advances in high-throughput screening, genome mining, and machine learning have greatly accelerated antimicrobial discovery, insufficient separation between antibacterial efficacy and host toxicity remains a bottleneck, precluding the clinical development of many promising compounds. Here, we establish a generalizable, two-component strategy to engineer antimicrobial safety and mobilize otherwise inaccessible chemical space for antimicrobial therapy, using calicheamicin, a potent cytotoxin with unacceptable host toxicity, as a proof of concept. In the first arm, we engineer a conditionally-active drug conjugate that limits calicheamicin activity to infected tissue, thereby reducing systemic toxicity. In the second arm, we co-administer a re-engineered self-resistance enzyme from Micromonospora echinospora, the natural producer of calicheamicin, as an "antidote" to neutralize calicheamicin present outside of infected tissue, further mitigating off-target toxicity. The conditionally-active conjugate exhibits activity against Gram-negative and Gram-positive pathogens in response to a protease present within the infected microenvironment. When delivered in combination with the antidote, antibacterial efficacy is maintained while off-target toxicity is reduced in mouse models of Gram positive and negative bacterial pneumonia. We anticipate that our dual strategy, which engineers, rather than selects for enhanced drug safety, by combining conditional drug activity with antidote-driven neutralization of off-target effects, provides a generalizable framework for mobilizing other promising but toxic compounds as antimicrobials.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
ACS Central Science
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
30.0%
2
Cell Chemical Biology
94 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.5%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 5%
7.6%
4
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
Science Translational Medicine
127 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.3%
6
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 29%
5.0%
7
Science
477 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
8
Nature Biomedical Engineering
47 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.3%
9
Journal of the American Chemical Society
217 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
10
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
11
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
93 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
ACS Chemical Biology
167 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
14
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
15
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.1%
16
Journal of Experimental Medicine
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
17
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.0%
18
Molecular Therapy
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
19
Nature Biotechnology
172 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
20
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 37%
0.8%
21
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy
30 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
22
Biomaterials
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
Nature Cancer
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
24
Nature Chemical Biology
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
25
mAbs
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
26
Cancer Cell
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%