Impact of Targeted Therapy on Progression-Free Survival in Breast Cancer: A Decade of Evidence from Randomized and Clinical Trials
Adesina, O. G.; Nwagwuogbe, F.
Show abstract
BackgroundTargeted therapies have transformed breast cancer management by focusing on molecular drivers such as HER2 amplification, hormone receptor signaling, and CDK4/6 pathways. They aim to increase disease control while reducing systemic toxicity compared to conventional chemotherapy. ObjectiveThis review assessed the effectiveness and safety of targeted therapies in advanced and metastatic breast cancer, with progression-free survival (PFS) as the primary outcome and overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety as secondary endpoints. MethodsA systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library was conducted between January 2015 to March 2025 for randomized controlled trials and large clinical studies comparing conventional and targeted pharmacotherapy in breast cancer. Eligible studies reporting progression-free survival were included. PRISMA guidelines were strictly followed. Data extraction and risk-of-bias assessments were performed independently by two reviewers. ResultsFifteen trials with more than 10,000 patients were included. In HER2-positive disease, trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) significantly improved PFS and OS compared with trastuzumab emtansine, while tucatinib combinations provided strong intracranial control. CDK4/6 inhibitors (ribociclib, palbociclib, abemaciclib) consistently extended PFS in HR+/HER2-populations across pre- and postmenopausal groups. For triple-negative breast cancer, atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel improved outcomes in PD-L1-positive patients. Safety profiles were distinct, with interstitial lung disease from T-DXd, hematologic toxicity from CDK4/6 inhibitors, and immune-related events with checkpoint inhibitors. ConclusionsTargeted therapies substantially improve PFS, with OS benefits in several trials, setting new standards across breast cancer subtypes. Balancing efficacy with toxicity management and improving global access remain essential to maximize clinical benefit.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- An updated PREDICT breast cancer prognostic model including the benefits and harms of radiotherapy 93%
- RNA Sequencing-Based Single Sample Predictors of Molecular Subtype and Risk of Recurrence for Clinical Assessment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer 92%
- A 20-feature radiomic signature of triple-negative breast cancer identifies patients at high risk of death 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical activity of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) inhibitors in patients with MAP2K1 (MEK1)-mutated metastatic cancers 93%
- An Evidenced-Based Prior for Estimating the Treatment Effect of Phase III Randomized Trials in Oncology 93%
- Clinical activity of MAPK targeted therapies in patients with non-V600 BRAF mutant tumors 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association between early discontinuation of endocrine therapy and recurrence of breast cancer among premenopausal women in a Danish population-based cohort 94%
- Phase 1b dose expansion and translational analyses of olaparib in combination with the oral AKT inhibitor capivasertib in recurrent endometrial, triple negative breast, and ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer 92%
- Clinicogenomic characterization of inflammatory breast cancer 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reversion and non-reversion mechanisms of resistance to PARP inhibitor or platinum chemotherapy in BRCA1/2-mutant metastatic breast cancer 92%
- Collateral damage: the impact on cancer outcomes of the COVID-19pandemic 92%
- Prevalence and mutational determinants of high tumor mutation burden in breast cancer 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.