Back

Impact of Targeted Therapy on Progression-Free Survival in Breast Cancer: A Decade of Evidence from Randomized and Clinical Trials

Adesina, O. G.; Nwagwuogbe, F.

2025-11-02 oncology
10.1101/2025.10.31.25339265 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundTargeted therapies have transformed breast cancer management by focusing on molecular drivers such as HER2 amplification, hormone receptor signaling, and CDK4/6 pathways. They aim to increase disease control while reducing systemic toxicity compared to conventional chemotherapy. ObjectiveThis review assessed the effectiveness and safety of targeted therapies in advanced and metastatic breast cancer, with progression-free survival (PFS) as the primary outcome and overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety as secondary endpoints. MethodsA systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library was conducted between January 2015 to March 2025 for randomized controlled trials and large clinical studies comparing conventional and targeted pharmacotherapy in breast cancer. Eligible studies reporting progression-free survival were included. PRISMA guidelines were strictly followed. Data extraction and risk-of-bias assessments were performed independently by two reviewers. ResultsFifteen trials with more than 10,000 patients were included. In HER2-positive disease, trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) significantly improved PFS and OS compared with trastuzumab emtansine, while tucatinib combinations provided strong intracranial control. CDK4/6 inhibitors (ribociclib, palbociclib, abemaciclib) consistently extended PFS in HR+/HER2-populations across pre- and postmenopausal groups. For triple-negative breast cancer, atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel improved outcomes in PD-L1-positive patients. Safety profiles were distinct, with interstitial lung disease from T-DXd, hematologic toxicity from CDK4/6 inhibitors, and immune-related events with checkpoint inhibitors. ConclusionsTargeted therapies substantially improve PFS, with OS benefits in several trials, setting new standards across breast cancer subtypes. Balancing efficacy with toxicity management and improving global access remain essential to maximize clinical benefit.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.