Back

Irritancy and spatial repellency efficacy of repellent-treated fabrics against Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera: Culicidae) in an excito-repellency system

Ahebwa, A.; Hii, J.; Nararak, J.; Kongmee, M.; Leepasert, T.; Chareonviriyaphap, T.

2025-11-02 infectious diseases
10.1101/2025.10.31.25339223 medRxiv
Show abstract

Mosquito-borne diseases remain a major public health challenge, driving the need for affordable and scalable vector control tools. In this study, we used an excito-repellency system to evaluate the deterrent potential of two low-cost repellent-treated fabrics consisting of Calico (100% cotton) and Jute (hessian), to a standard treated bed net polyester (BNP), against a laboratory strain of Aedes aegypti (L.). Fabrics (15 x 17.5 cm) were treated with six concentrations of transfluthrin and metofluthrin, and five of permethrin, categorized as low and high doses. Chemical retention was assessed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), and behavioral avoidance was measured via chamber escape responses over 30 minutes using 60 female mosquitoes per replicate (n = 4). Calico elicited the strongest mosquito escape (OR = 3.12) followed by Jute (OR = 1.74). Transfluthrin (OR = 5.45) produced the most escape whereas low dose treatments resulted in greater escape (OR = 1.23) than high dose applications. Non-contact chambers elicited more escape (OR = 1.87) than the contact test chamber, indicating stronger spatial repellency than irritancy. GC-MS results confirmed fabric-specific chemical retention dynamics: permethrin remained stable across all fabrics and time points, while transfluthrin retention varied significantly between Calico and BNP after 24 h drying. These findings highlight the importance of fabric- insecticide compatibility and the influence of exposure method, dose, and chemical volatility on repellent efficacy. Notably, both metofluthrin-treated fabrics and BNP exhibited pronounced insecticidal effects, suggesting that toxicity may mask repellency--a hypothesis warranting further evaluation at lower concentrations.

Published in PLOS ONE (predicted rank #3) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.