Interaural time and level differences contribute differently to source segregation and spatial selection
Richardson, B. N.; Luthra, S.; Kainerstorfer, J. M.; Shinn-Cunningham, B. G.; Brown, C. A.
Show abstract
Interaural time and level differences are crucial in sound localization, yet their contributions to sound source segregation and spatial selection remain underspecified. Here, participants completed a spatial auditory selective attention task while we measured hemodynamic activity in the prefrontal cortex and superior temporal gyrus using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Participants listened to a target sound stream and a simultaneous spatially separated speech stream or white noise masker. Sound streams were spatialized with either 50 s ITDs, 500 s ITDs, naturally occurring ILDs from a non-individualized HRTF, or broadband 10 dB ILDs. Behavioral results revealed a stronger effect of spatial cues when the masker was speech. Error patterns differed in the two difficult conditions, small ITDs and natural ILDs: small ITDs produced lower hit rates, while naturally occurring ILDs produced higher false alarm rates. Small ITDs led to greater activity in prefrontal cortex and activity in superior temporal gyrus that was lateralized, greater in the hemisphere contralateral to attentional focus, consistent with previous reports. These results suggest that natural ILDs alone support source segregation even if they are insufficient to cause large shifts in perceived lateralization, explaining high false alarm rates (confusions between target and distractor words). In contrast, small ITDs alone may be insufficient to segregate competing sources, leading to low hit and false alarm rates. Together, these results reveal differences in how ITDs and ILDs contribute to auditory scene analysis and spatial attention.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Salience-dependent disruption of sustained auditory attention can be inferred from evoked pupil responses and neural tracking of task-irrelevant sounds 97%
- Does amplitude compression help or hinder attentional neural speech tracking? 97%
- Isolating neural signatures of conscious speech perception with a no-report sine-wave speechparadigm 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impoverished auditory cues limit engagement of brain networks controlling spatial selective attention 98%
- Cross-modal interactions at the audiovisual cocktail-party revealed by behavior, ERPs, and neural oscillations 97%
- Cortical auditory distance representation based on direct-to-reverberant energy ratio 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Consonance perception in congenital amusia: behavioral and brain responses to harmonicity and beating cues 96%
- Beat-based and memory-based temporal expectations in rhythm: similar perceptual effects, different underlying mechanisms 96%
- Neural activity during story listening is synchronized across individuals despite acoustic masking 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cortical-brainstem interplay during speech perception in older adults with and without hearing loss 96%
- Amplified cortical tracking of word-level features of continuous competing speech in older adults 96%
- Cortical tracking of voice pitch in the presence of multiple speakers depends on selective attention 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Individual Differences in Cognition and Perception Predict Neural Processing of Speech in Noise for Audiometrically Normal Listeners. 97%
- Effects of stimulus rate and periodicity on auditory cortical entrainment to continuous sounds 97%
- Neural Speech-Tracking During Selective Attention: A spatially realistic audiovisual study 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.