Back

Sensory receptor expansion and neural accommodation in butterfly color vision

Gao, K.; Ainsworth, J.; Donati, A.; Zhao, Y.; Ragsac, M. F.; Genduso, C.; Andre, Z.; Tomlinson, A.; Perry, M. W.

2025-10-31 developmental biology
10.1101/2025.10.30.685642 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The evolution of complex brains required existing neurons and neural circuits to accommodate new inputs. The genetic and developmental mechanisms that enable such integration are largely unknown. Butterflies evolved more complex retinal mosaics through the addition of a second R7 color photoreceptor per ommatidium (unit eye). In Drosophila, the unique R7 makes a stochastic choice to express one of two opsin genes. In butterflies, the two R7s make independent stochastic cell fate choices in each ommatidium, producing three ommatidial types instead of two. Here, we investigate the developmental basis of this change and how the butterfly brain accommodates expanded sensory receptor input. We first identified the changes in gene expression that cause a second R7 cell to be specified. We then modified Drosophila retinas to have butterfly-like transcription factor expression, causing recruitment of an additional R7. The two R7s make independent stochastic choices, like butterflies, leading to three stochastically distributed ommatidial types. In Drosophila, the two R7 subtypes connect to their target neurons, either yDm8 or pDm8. Dm8 neurons of both types are born in excess and Dm8s that do not find connections with their cognate y or pR7s undergo apoptosis. In the presence of extra R7s in butterfly-like fly retinas, additional Dm8s are retained, leading to two Dm8s per medulla column that make appropriate connections with the matching R7 subtypes, facilitating the expansion of color vision. We propose that the presence of cells that would otherwise die provide developmental flexibility that can allow brains to accommodate newly evolved inputs.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.