Testing genomic offset with common gardens in genetically structured black spruce (Picea mariana)
Fijarczyk, A.; Robert, E.; Marquis, B.; Lamothe, M.; Lenz, P.; Girardin, M. P.; Isabel, N.
Show abstract
Boreal forests play a crucial role in regulating climate via storage and release of carbon. Anticipated changes in climate are predicted to increase mortality and decrease the biomass of many boreal tree species, putting at risk the functioning of this ecosystem and hence its role in carbon absorption and climate change mitigation. Genomic offset methods leverage spatial distribution of genomic diversity and its association with environmental variables to generate maps of populations vulnerable to projected changes in climate. Here we analyse over 60 populations and more than 1400 individuals of black spruce (Picea mariana (Mill.) B.S.P), a dominant boreal forest species, to compare population-level genomic offsets calculated with Gradient Forest with multiple fitness traits measured in four long-term (>40 yr) common gardens. Within common gardens, we found that genomic offset predictions were unaffected by the number or type of markers used for model training, with the exception of LFMM climate-associated markers. Most models predicted fitness equally well even when the number of populations in the training set was reduced down to ten or was restricted to a single genetic cluster, suggesting that Gradient Forest can reliably estimate fitness for new populations and novel climates. However, model performances varied among common gardens, with highly accurate fitness predictions in some gardens but contradictory results in others. The accuracy of model predictions was strongly influenced by the choice of climate variables and their relationships with fitness traits. Overall, our results indicate that predicting genomic offsets in genetically structured species across large spatial scales is challenging, because of variation in environmental effects on genotypes and in the interactions among climate variables across the landscape. By capitalizing on our comprehensive validation, we identified the most robust models for projecting black spruce fitness loss in response to future climate change.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Genomic signatures of climate-driven (mal)adaptation in an iconic conifer, the English yew (Taxus baccata L.) 97%
- Genomic and common garden approaches yield complementary results for quantifying environmental drivers of local adaptation in rubber rabbitbrush, a foundational Great Basin shrub 96%
- Divergent selection predating the Last Glacial Maximum mainly acted on macro-phenotypes in Norway spruce 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating the persistence and utility of five wild Vitis species in the context of climate change 96%
- Harnessing landscape genomics to evaluate genomic vulnerability and future climate resilience in an East Asia perennial 96%
- Regional differences in the abiotic environment contribute to genomic divergence within a wild tomato species 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Hybridization mediated range expansion and climate change resilience in two keystone tree species of boreal forest 97%
- How useful is genomic data for predicting maladaptation to future climate? 95%
- Climate change, weather, and geography shape seed mass variation and decline across western North America 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.