Non-decision time-informed collapsing threshold diffusion model: A joint modeling framework with identifiable time-dependent parameters
Hadian Rasanan, A. H.; Schumacher, L.; D Nunez, M.; Weindel, G.; Rieskamp, J.
Show abstract
Over the past sixty years, evidence accumulation models have emerged as a dominant framework for explaining the neural and behavioral aspects of the process underlying decision making. These models have also been widely used as a measurement instrument to assess individual differences in latent cognitive constructs underlying decision making. A central assumption of most of these models is that decision makers accumulate noisy evidence until a fixed decision threshold is reached. However, both behavioral and neuroscientific findings, along with theoretical considerations related to optimality, have suggested that the decision threshold varies over time. Although time-dependent threshold models often provide a better account of empirical data, a major challenge associated with these models is the unreliable estimation of their parameters. This limitation has led researchers to emphasize model-fitting comparisons rather than interpreting parameter values or accounting for individual differences in the dynamics of the decision threshold. In this work, we address the reliability issue of parameter estimation in time-dependent threshold diffusion models by proposing a joint modeling approach that links non-decision time to external observations. Parameter recovery simulations demonstrate that informing the diffusion model with trial-level noisy measurements of non-decision time substantially improves the reliability of parameter estimation for time-dependent threshold diffusion models. Additionally, we reanalyzed the experimental data from two perceptual decision-making tasks to illustrate the feasibility of the proposed modeling approach. Non-decision time measurements were extracted from electroencephalography (EEG) recordings using the hidden multivariate pattern method. The cognitive modeling results revealed that, in addition to the reliable parameter estimation, constraining non-decision time improves the fit to behavioral data.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Valid and powerful group statistics for decoding accuracy: Information Prevalence Inference using the i-th order statistic (i-test) 93%
- How to test for phasic modulation of neural and behavioural responses 93%
- Fighting or Embracing Multiplicity in Neuroimaging? Neighborhood Leverage versus Global Calibration 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Motor response vigour and fixations reflect subjective preferences during intertemporal choice 94%
- Artificial neural networks for model identification and parameter estimation in computational cognitive models 93%
- Magnitude-sensitive reaction times reveal non-linear time costs in multi-alternative decision-making 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Modeling dynamic allocation of effort in a sequential task using discounting models 94%
- Decoding continuous variables from event-related potential (ERP) data with linear support vector regression (SVR) using the Decision Decoding Toolbox (DDTBOX) 92%
- Brain Serotonergic Fibers Suggest Anomalous Diffusion-Based Dropout in Artificial Neural Networks 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.