Back

Integrative Multi-Omics Identifies CDK1 as a Key Signaling Regulator of CD4+ T Cell Effector Function

Servaas, N. H.; Bauersachs, H. G.; Abreu, L.; Claringbould, A.; Berest, I.; Schwarz, J. J.; Stein, F.; Faelth-Savitski, M.; Eismann, L.; Reddington, J. P.; Zaugg, J. B.

2025-10-31 genomics
10.1101/2025.10.30.685551 bioRxiv
Show abstract

CD4 T cell differentiation is orchestrated by coordinated signaling, transcriptional, and epigenomic programs, yet how signaling connects to chromatin and genetic variation in human T cells remains unclear. Here, we generated an integrative multi-omics map of human CD4 T cell activation and differentiation, combining phosphoproteomics, transcriptomics, and chromatin accessibility under Th0, Th1, and iTreg polarization. Within 10 minutes of activation, we observed rapid phosphorylation changes of RNA-binding proteins accompanied by degradation of effector-associated transcripts, preceding chromatin remodeling and later transcriptional activation of the same genes. Moreover, our data highlights how site-specific phosphorylation refines TF activity during T cell differentiation and activation, and identifies CDK1 as a regulator of Th1 effector function. Indeed, we found that a low dose of CKD1 inhibition impairs IFN-{gamma} expression and pro-inflammatory differentiation, while preserving regulatory features in iTregs. Single-cell multi-omic profiling upon CDK1 inhibition revealed how CDK1 activity shapes subset-specific gene regulatory networks, which are enriched for genetic variants associated with immune-traits. Specifically, CDK1-sensitive TFs, including IRF8, connect immune trait heritability to enhancer accessibility at IFNG and TNF loci. Together, these results establish CDK1 as a signaling hub that couples phosphorylation to gene regulation and genetic risk, with therapeutic relevance in autoimmune disease.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.