Back

Cohesin Acetylation and ATPase Activity Control Cohesion and Loop Architecture through Distinct Mechanisms

Costantino, L.; Ye, T.; Boardman, K.; Xiang, S.; Luo, J.; Mu, Y.; Ma, W.; Koshland, D.

2025-10-31 genetics
10.1101/2025.10.30.685539 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cohesin is a conserved protein complex that mediates sister chromatid cohesion, chromosome condensation, gene regulation, and DNA repair. These processes rely on cohesins ability to tether sister chromatids and form chromatin loops, which depend on cohesins ATPase activity and Eco1-mediated acetylation of two lysine residues (K112 and K113 in budding yeast) in its Smc3 subunit. How cohesins ATPase activity and acetylation integrate to control cohesin functions remains poorly understood. Here, we analyzed chromatin architecture in yeast mutants with altered cohesin acetylation and/or ATPase activity. We find that acetylation of either K112 or K113 is sufficient to produce a wild-type chromosome structure with loops positioned at cohesin-associated regions (CARs), whereas loss of acetylation at both residues abolishes positioned loops, indicating that acetylation at either lysine alone can maintain wild-type chromatin architecture. We further show that a cohesin acetylation mutant, despite being defective in sister-chromatid tethering and thus failing to establish cohesion, still forms wild-type-like loops, while cohesion-competent mutants lack positioned loops. These results suggest that the activities required for cohesion and loop formation are mechanistically separable, arguing against passive loop capture. Moreover, a mutant with reduced ATPase activity showed a loop profile similar to wild type, indicating that cohesin with lower ATPase activity can still form wild-type chromatin architecture. By contrast, hyper-ATPase mutants accumulate positioned loops, suggesting that increasing ATPase activity can enhance loop processivity. Together, our findings support a multilayered regulatory model in which acetylation fine-tunes ATPase output and cohesin functions to shape genome architecture.

Published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (predicted rank #2) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.