Back

Origins and diversity of Exmoor ponies: A mitogenome framework for assessing maternal lineage diversification in endangered pony breeds

Davy, D.; Kinghorn, A.; Brumwell, A.; Kilbride, E.; Baker, S.; Davy, P. M. C.; Al Ghaithi, F.; Mable, B. K.

2025-10-31 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2025.10.30.685304 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In response to growing concerns over human-driven biodiversity loss, rewilding efforts increasingly employ semi-wild herbivores to restore ecosystems. The Exmoor pony is often cited as an ancient breed retaining primitive traits suited for such projects, yet its genetic history remains underexplored. We combined studbook records, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) D-loop, and whole mitogenome sequences to evaluate maternal lineage diversity for improved management recommendations and the phylogenetic placement of Exmoor ponies among modern and ancient breeds. We also assessed whether data from multiple breeds already available based on D-loop sequences could be organised into a useful framework for resolving the complex history of modern horse breeds. We identified eight mtDNA haplotypes among 88 Exmoor pony samples, representing all extant maternal lines. While phylogenetic trees based on D-loop sequences lacked resolution, clustering published sequences to a mitogenome-derived haplogroup framework allowed assessment of the distribution and relationships of lineages across diverse horse populations, including ancient DNA samples and Przelwalskis horses. The most basal lineages of Exmoors were traced back to the Pleistocene, supporting their ancient origin and status as a primitive population, with a possible ancestral role in the development of some modern breeds. The founder lineages were found to be polyphyletic, with more derived haplogroups representing subsequent mixture with other domestic horse breeds. Although nuclear genome sequencing is needed to fully assess levels of admixture, we identified new haplotypes, along with rare or basal haplotypes that could be prioritised for conservation in rewilding studies. Our results highlight the potential for broad testing of hypotheses about origins and relationships among horse breeds using short regions of DNA mapped onto a more robust phylogenetic framework resolved through comparison of whole mitogenomes.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 14%
14.1%
2
Conservation Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.1%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
9.9%
4
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
5
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.6%
6
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.5%
7
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
9
Genetics Selection Evolution
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
10
Gigabyte
60 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
11
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
12
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
13
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 46%
1.5%
15
Journal of Anatomy
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
16
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
17
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
18
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.2%
19
Animals
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
20
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
61 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
21
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.9%
22
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
23
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
25
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
26
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
27
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Gene
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.6%