D- and L-lactate consumers in the human gut are taxonomically, biochemically, and energetically different
Allaart, M. T.; Tyakht, A. V.; Ley, R.; Pabst, M.; Stouten, G. R.; Angenent, L. T.
Show abstract
The human gut microbiota routinely produces D- and L-lactate during fermentation; however, the microbial fate of these stereoisomers, particularly the neurotoxic D-lactate, remains poorly understood. Given that D-lactate is an unavoidable byproduct of digestion, understanding its microbial turnover is essential for linking gut metabolism to host health. Here, we used chemostat bioreactors (pH 7.0, 37{degrees}C, and a solids retention time [SRT] of 4 d) to simulate gut-relevant, transient nutrient conditions and to enrich for lactate-consuming communities. DL-lactate-consuming consortia were enriched from a human-derived microbiota and then inoculated into duplicate bioreactors, which were fed exclusively D- or L-lactate. After steady-state was reached, the fed lactate stereoisomers were switched to assess community resilience. Regardless of the fed stereoisomer, the fermentation product spectra were consistent and dominated by acetate, propionate, and CO2. However, microbial communities and biomass yields diverged sharply, with a high relative abundance of Anaerotignum in D-lactate enrichments and Acidipropionibacterium and Propionibacterium in L-lactate enrichments. Notably, the biomass yield for D-lactate feeding was less than half that for L-lactate feeding, suggesting that the two isomers are metabolized through distinct biochemical pathways despite similar product spectra. Metagenomic and metaproteomic analyses confirmed this divergence at the pathway level. Our findings reveal how the stereoisomer identity of microbes shapes their niche specialization in the gut, with implications for understanding the ecology and clinical impact of lactate metabolism.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Inter-kingdom microbial interactions revealed by a comparative machine-learning guided multi-omics analysis of industrial-scale biogas plants 96%
- Exploring the interaction network of a synthetic gut bacterial community 96%
- Protozoa populations are ecosystem engineers that shape prokaryotic community structure and function of the rumen microbial ecosystem 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Alternate routes to acetate tolerance lead to varied isoprenol production from mixed carbon sources in Pseudomonas putida 94%
- High Enzyme Promiscuity in Lignin Degradation Mechanisms in Rhodopseudomonas palustris CGA009 94%
- Physiological characterization of nitrate ammonifying bacteria isolated from rice paddy soils via a newly developed high-throughput screening method 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Population dynamics analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae deletion library during fed-batch cultivation using Bar-seq 95%
- Escherichia coli metabolism under short-term repetitive substrate dynamics: Adaptation and trade-offs 94%
- Genome-scale metabolic modelling enables deciphering ethanol metabolism via the acrylate pathway in the propionate-producer Anaerotignum neopropionicum 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Metabolic network construction reveals probiotic-specific alterations in the metabolic activity of a synthetic small intestinal community 97%
- Exploring the interspecific interactions and the metabolome of the soil isolate Hylemonella gracilis 95%
- Bacterial microcompartments linked to the flavin-based extracellular electron transfer drives anaerobic ethanolamine utilization in Listeria monocytogenes 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Single-cell genomics of uncultured bacteria reveals dietary fiber responders in the mouse gut microbiota 96%
- Increased Replication Rates of Dissimilatory Nitrogen-Reducing Bacteria Leads to Decreased Anammox Reactor Performance 95%
- Microbiomes attached to fresh perennial ryegrass- are temporally resilient and adapt to changing ecological niches 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.