Back

Comparison of two different finite element modeling pipelines for virtual mechanical testing of the distal third metacarpal bone in Thoroughbred racehorses

Irandoust, S.; Malekipour, F.; Whitton, C.; Muir, P.; Lee, P. V. S.; Henak, C.

2025-10-31 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.10.29.685454 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Condylar stress fracture of the third metacarpal bone (MC3) in Thoroughbred racehorses is a common catastrophic injury and identification of horses at heightened risk remains subjective. Standing computed tomography (sCT) is a practical screening tool that is sensitive to fatigue-induced structural changes. Data from sCT also allows for patient-specific finite element analysis (FEA) of the distal MC3 and prediction of subchondral bone strain, as a potential objective classifier of racehorses at heightened risk. The goal of this study was to compare two independently developed sCT-based subject-specific FEA pipelines for virtual mechanical testing of the distal MC3. One pipeline models the full 3D distal MC3 (UWMSN), while the other uses a simpler approach by using single sCT slices (UMELB). Four (n=4) MC3 condyles from four Thoroughbred racehorses were selected for the study. Models were generated using both pipelines and the predicted subchondral bone strain was compared. UMELB predicted smaller subchondral strain compared to UWMSN, likely due to more limited modes of deformation. Although the UWMSN pipeline can identify elevated subchondral strain in horses with high fatigue damage, it is more labor intensive and computationally expensive. With further tuning and validation, the UMELB pipeline could be used as a simpler and faster approach for prediction of subchondral strain in the distal MC3.

Published in Journal of Biomechanical Engineering (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

Journal of Biomechanical Engineering · published here
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 19%
9.7%
3
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.6%
4
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.8%
5
Acta Biomaterialia
92 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.8%
6
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.0%
9
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
10
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
11
Bone
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
12
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
13
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.8%
14
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.6%
15
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
JBMR Plus
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
17
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
18
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
19
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.1%
20
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%
21
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.6%