Global disruption of plant biogeography by non-native species
Cai, L.; Weigelt, P.; Kreft, H.; Bruelheide, H.; Davis, A. J.; Dawson, W.; Essl, F.; van Kleunen, M.; Kühn, I.; Lenzner, B.; Pergl, J.; Pysek, P.; Pelser, P. B.; Wieringa, J. J.; Winter, M.
Show abstract
Biogeographical regions reflect differences in biotic composition resulting from long-term isolation and biogeographical processes, but how human-mediated introductions of non-native species have altered these biogeographical patterns remains unclear. Using global distribution data of 279,441 native and 10,067 non-native seed plant species, we analyzed the impact of species introductions on global organization of biogeographical regions. We show that species introductions have disrupted plant biogeography, causing the loss of distinct floristic realms and subrealms. Due to the impact of non-native species, geographic proximity and dispersal barriers are less important-- particularly as trade-facilitated species exchange drives floristic homogenization--while environmental factors remain critical in structuring floristic regions. Our findings reveal that plant introductions erode biogeographical distinctness and highlight the urgent need for coordinated action to protect native biotas.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evolutionary time best explains the latitudinal diversity gradient of living freshwater fish diversity 96%
- Megafauna diversity and functional declines in Europe from the Last Interglacial (LIG) to the present 94%
- Hard-to-sample species are more sensitive to land-use change: implications for global biodiversity metrics 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.