Back

The eco-evolutionary assembly of complex communities with multiple interaction types

Araujo, G.; Lurgi, M.

2025-10-30 ecology
10.1101/2025.10.29.685318 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Identifying the mechanisms that generate structure in complex ecological communities is fundamental to understand their assembly. A comprehensive picture of how ecology and evolution act together to generate these patterns is in its infancy. We developed an eco-evolutionary model of community assembly that incorporates interaction-driven population dynamics and evolutionary processes, including speciation and the inheritance of interactions, to unveil the mechanisms of generation and maintenance of biodiversity in complex species interaction networks. Importantly, our model unpicks the effects of selection of interaction types from those of inheritance by comparing evolutionary assembly with assembly by invasion under different combinations of interaction types. We found that a cost-benefit balance of accumulating interactions separates communities into two distinct types. Interactions with weak benefits for the partners involved produce communities with sparse species interaction networks dominated by competition. Strongly beneficial interactions, on the other hand, give rise to highly mutualistic, more connected communities. Mutualism, driven by both selection and inheritance, facilitates the emergence of large yet stable communities with increased complexity. By contrasting the model results with empirical patterns from microbial communities, we identify potential drivers of the assembly of these complex ecosystems and their likely patterns of interaction. Our results provide a classification system of complex ecosystems based on their composition of ecological interactions, thus generating testable hypotheses on the conditions under which different community types (mutualistic vs. competitive) might emerge.

Published in Nature Communications (predicted rank #4) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.