Back

Flexibility of territorial aggression in urban and rural Chaffinches

Yelimlies, A.; Onsal, C.; Akcay, C.

2025-10-30 animal behavior and cognition
10.1101/2025.10.29.685300 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Rapid environmental change due to urbanization poses novel challenges to animals. Behavioral change and individual plasticity are generally hypothesized to be the key to adapting to these challenges. One commonly observed behavioral change is higher observed aggression levels in urban animals, perhaps because anthropogenic noise disrupts effective acoustic communication during conflicts, leading to greater use of physical aggression. We investigated the hypothesis that urban noise drives aggression by performing repeated simulated territorial intrusion experiments on rural and urban chaffinches (Fringilla coelebs). We expected urban chaffinches to be more aggressive, change their aggression levels more between trials, and for aggression to increase with noise levels, irrespective of the habitat. We found that while aggression didnt differ between habitats in the initial trial, rural chaffinches decreased their aggression level in the second trial and thus were less aggressive than the urban chaffinches, who did not change their response. That is, urban birds were less flexible in responding to an intruder than rural birds, contrary to previous findings in other songbirds. Moreover, there was an increase in aggression with increasing noise levels, irrespective of the habitat. Given our small sample size and lack of spatial replicates, our results should be interpreted with caution. Nevertheless, as a lack of flexibility in aggression is potentially costly, our results highlight the importance of studying the plasticity in aggressive behavior in human-impacted landscapes.

Published in Ecology and Evolution (predicted rank #9) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.