Spinal Cord Stimulation Improves Feedback Control of Reaching Post-Stroke
Refy, O.; Borda, L.; Hsu, J.; Carranza, E.; Verma, N.; de Freitas, R. M.; Sorensen, E.; Boos, A.; Powell, M.; Fisher, L. E.; Gerszten, P.; Pirondini, E.; Krakauer, J. W.; Wittenberg, G. F.; Geyer, H.; Capogrosso, M.; Weber, D. J.
Show abstract
Cervical spinal cord stimulation (SCS) improves upper-limb function in individuals with chronic post-stroke hemiparesis, yet how it shapes motor control of arm movement remains unclear. During goal-directed reaching in healthy individuals, movements consist of a coordinated acceleration phase toward the target followed by a deceleration phase that stabilizes the limb near the endpoint. Disruptions in neuromotor control post-stroke can be partially restored by SCS, with prominent improvements occurring in the deceleration phase. To quantitatively characterize these effects, we used a proportional-derivative (PD) control model to fit planar reaching data from 12 healthy and 5 stroke participants. Movements were well described by the model, with proportional gain terms capturing the acceleration phase and derivative gain terms capturing velocity-dependent deceleration. In healthy individuals, model fits revealed a consistent balance between position and velocity-dependent torques that closely matched the optimal solution for smooth and stable reaching predicted by optimal feedback control simulations. In stroke, this balance was altered and partially normalized by SCS, with the most consistent changes observed in the velocity-dependent term. While the prevailing hypothesis is that SCS boosts motor drive to weak agonistic muscles, these results indicate a synergistic and potentially dominant effect in suppressing hyperexcitability of antagonistic muscles controlling the deceleration phase of movement. Finally, the PD controller model revealed frequency-dependent effects of SCS, suggesting that the model parameters may serve as biomarkers for guiding the selection of stimulation parameters. This work serves as a framework for characterizing how neuromodulatory therapies influence arm control .
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Less is more: selection from a small set of options improves BCI velocity control 95%
- Identifying alterations in hand movement coordination from chronic stroke survivors using a wearable high-density EMG sleeve 94%
- Motor somatotopy impacts imagery strategy success in human intracortical brain-computer interfaces 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of Spared and Proportionally Controllable Hand Motor Dimensions in Motor Complete Spinal Cord Injuries Using Latent Manifold Analysis 95%
- Multi-grip classification-based prosthesis control with two EMG-IMU sensors 94%
- Haptic assistance that restricts use of redundant solutions is detrimental to motor learning 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.