A more comprehensive and reliable analysis of individual differences with generalized random forest for high-dimensional data: validation and guidelines
Lee, J.; Park, J. J.; Pak, M.; Choi, S. Y.; Cha, J.
Show abstract
Analyzing individual differences in treatment or exposure effects is a central challenge in psychology and behavioral sciences. Conventional statistical models have focused on average treatment effects, overlooking individual variability, and struggling to identify key moderators. Generalized Random Forest (GRF) can predict individualized treatment effects, but current implementations suffer from two critical limitations: (1) prediction performances vary substantially across random initializations, and (2) identification of key moderator is limited in high-dimensional settings. Here, we introduce two methodological advances to address these issues. First, a seed ensemble strategy stabilizes predictions by aggregating models trained under different random initializations. Second, a backward elimination procedure systematically identifies key moderators from high-dimensional inputs. Simulation analyses across diverse scenarios demonstrate that our approach achieves reliable and valid predictions across random seeds, improved performance in moderator identification, and robust generalization to independent data. To facilitate adoption and interpretation, we provide step-by-step guidance using large-scale neuroimaging dataset (N = 8,778) with reusable code. These enhancements make GRF more reliable for modeling individual differences in treatment effects, supporting data-driven hypothesis generation, and identification of responsive subgroups.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Model Checking via Testing for Direct Effects in Mendelian Randomization and Transcriptome-wide Association Studies 92%
- Explaining distortions in metacognition with an attractor network model of decision uncertainty 92%
- Enabling interpretable machine learning for biological data with reliability scores 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A brain-based universal measure of attention: predicting task-general and task-specific attention performance and their underlying neural mechanisms from task and resting state fMRI 92%
- Brain network dynamics predict moments of surprise across contexts 90%
- Distractor-specific control adaptation in multidimensional environments 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- A general exposome factor explains individual differences in functional brain network topography and cognition in youth 93%
- Multi-Level Multi-Growth Models: New opportunities for addressing developmental theory using longitudinal designs 92%
- Connectome-Based Predictive Modeling of Concurrent and Prospective Substance Use in Adolescence 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.