Back

A non-invasive method to genotype cephalopod sex by quantitative PCR

Rubino, F. A.; Coffing, G. C.; Gibbons, C. J.; Small, S. T.; Desvignes, T.; Pessutti, J.; Petersen, A. M.; Arkhipkin, A.; Shcherbich, Z.; Postlethwait, J. H.; Kern, A. D.; Montague, T. G.

2025-10-29 genetics
10.1101/2025.10.28.685099 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Coleoid cephalopods (cuttlefish, octopus, and squid) are emerging model organisms in neuroscience, development, and evolutionary biology, and are of major economic importance in global fisheries. However, they are notoriously difficult and expensive to culture. The ability to determine sex early in development would enable more efficient and sustainable population management in both laboratory and wild settings. Here, we present a non-invasive method to genotype the sex of dwarf cuttlefish (Ascarosepion bandense) as young as three hours post-hatching using a skin swab and quantitative PCR assay, which detects a two-fold dosage difference between ZZ and Z0 sex chromosomes of males and females, respectively. Furthermore, we designed and validated primers for four additional cephalopod research species with assembled genomes (Octopus bimaculoides, Sepia officinalis, Euprymna berryi, Doryteuthis pealeii), and for a wild-caught species of economic value (Illex illecebrosus) using low-coverage whole genome sequencing data. This method enables accurate sex determination from hatchlings to adults across cephalopods, independent of genome quality or availability. HighlightsO_LIThe Z sex chromosome was identified in multiple cuttlefish, squid, and octopus species. C_LIO_LIA sensitive quantitative PCR assay can genotype ZZ/Z0 sex in each species. C_LIO_LILow-coverage short-read sequencing data is sufficient to design effective primers. C_LIO_LIqPCR on non-invasive skin swabs enables genotyping of living animals. C_LI

Published in iScience (predicted rank #11) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.