Back

Mid-level visual features engage V4 to support sparse object recognition under uncertainty

Loued-Khenissi, L.; Scialom, E.; Lutti, A.; Herzog, M. H.; Draganski, B.

2025-10-29 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.10.28.685033 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cortical visual prostheses aim to restore sight by stimulating the visual cortex, yet current approaches remain limited. Implants targeting V1 typically evoke isolated phosphenes that do not support coherent object recognition. We asked whether mid-level visual features, specifically curve segments associated with area V4, could provide a more efficient substrate for artificial vision. Using fMRI, 24 participants performed an object recognition task with stimuli fragmented into either phosphene-like dots or curve segments at varying densities. Behaviorally, curve segments enabled recognition at lower density thresholds and produced steeper psychometric slopes. Neurally, both fragment types engaged V1, but only curve segments recruited V4, and correct recognition of segments relative to phosphenes evoked broader occipito-temporo-parietal responses. Multivariate decoding showed that successful recognition of phosphenes was predicted by early visual and cingulate activity, whereas recognition of segments was predicted only by V4, indicating a shift toward mid-level representational support. Mediation analyses further showed that phosphene-based recognition relied on anterior cingulate cortex under conditions of higher uncertainty, while segment-based recognition depended primarily on visual cortex. Together, these results show that mid-level fragments confer perceptual and neural advantages, reducing reliance on both dense stimulation and downstream uncertainty resolution, and identify V4 as a promising target for next-generation cortical prostheses.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.