Back

Multi-Centre Randomised Controlled Feasibility Testing of a Physical Activity Micropattern Intervention Among Socioeconomically Diverse Women

Koemel, N.; Bissett, M.; Ryde, G.; Ahmadi, M.; Atsiaris, K.; Chen, X.; Teixeira-Pinto, A.; Liu, S.; Maher, C.; Chong, K. H.; Bauman, A.; Sawan, M.; Thogersen-Ntoumani, C.; Gray, C.; Gill, J.; Stamatakis, E.

2025-10-30 public and global health
10.1101/2025.10.28.25339013 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMost physical activity interventions adopt a one-size-fits-all approach, often developed and tested in higher socioeconomic groups, with little consideration of barriers experienced by women from lower socioeconomic backgrounds. Micropatterns, defined as brief bursts of moderate-to-vigorous incidental physical activity lasting under three minutes, represent a form of everyday movement that requires minimal time, equipment, or planning, making them a promising target for intervention. This randomized controlled study evaluated the feasibility, acceptability and potential effectiveness of a co-designed wearable-based micropatterns intervention aimed at increasing moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) among socioeconomically diverse women. MethodsA multi-centre, single-blinded, 6-week randomised controlled feasibility study was conducted among women from Sydney, Australia and Glasgow, UK aged [≥]30 years who self-reported no leisure time physical activity and could comfortably participate in activities of daily living. To ensure socioeconomic diversity, we used quota-based recruitment with area-level and individual-level indicators of socioeconomic status. Participants were randomised to one of three intervention arms; 1) Smartphone application only (APP); 2) smartphone application combined with a wearable device (Fitbit Inspire 3; W-APP); and 3) smartphone application and wearable device, supplemented by a social community component that included two in-person workshops and online forums (W-APP-C). Feasibility was assessed as completion rates of the study and follow-up surveys were conducted to assess the acceptability of the intervention. Wrist-worn accelerometry was collected at pre- and post-intervention to assess the potential effectiveness of the intervention. ResultsForty-three participants (mean age (SD); 54.8 (10.7) years) were recruited across both sites (APP n = 13; W-APP n = 17; W-APP-C n = 13). When taking into consideration individual-level indicators of socioeconomic status including income, number of dependents, and educational attainment, there was diverse representation across low (20.9%), medium (48.8%), and high (30.2%) socioeconomic groups. Completion of the 6-week intervention was high across both intervention sites and all three trial arms (86%). Qualitative feedback from both trial sites indicated high satisfaction, the majority of the participants thought the intervention was enjoyable (97.9%), user-friendly (69.9%), the wearable technology increased motivation to do activity (87.5%), and the community workshops were beneficial (75%). Across all participants, there was an average daily increase of 9.8 (27.8) min/day MVPA following the intervention. The greatest increase in MVPA was observed in the W-APP-C group (15.5 (23.1) min/day), followed by the APP group (11.4 (25.5) min/day), and the W-APP group 2.6 (32.1) min/day. ConclusionsThis multi-centre randomised controlled feasibility trial highlights the feasibility and acceptability of a wearable-based micropattern intervention in women from socioeconomically and culturally diverse backgrounds.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
38.0%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.4%
50% of probability mass above
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.4%
4
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
5
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
6
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
7
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
8
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
9
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
10
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
11
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
12
International Journal of Public Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
14
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
15
BMC Geriatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
16
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
17
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
18
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
19
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.6%
20
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
21
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
22
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
24
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
25
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 80%
0.5%