Back

An intron-based timer for circadian rhythms

Yuan, Y.; Linskens, A.; Gouvea, R. D.; Liu, H.; Xiao, Y.; Suresh, S.; Hu, I.; Yadlapalli, S.

2025-10-27 molecular biology
10.1101/2025.10.27.684876 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Abstract: Circadian clocks regulate daily rhythms in all eukaryotes through [~]24-hour transcriptional-translational feedback loops driven by clock proteins. However, the molecular mechanisms that set the 24-hour period remain poorly defined. Here, using single-molecule imaging and nascent RNA sequencing, we uncover an unexpected RNA-based molecular timer: a single intron in the Drosophila timeless (tim) gene that regulates circadian period length by controlling mRNA localization. Strikingly, we find that [~]50% of tim mRNAs are localized to the nucleus due to inefficient post-transcriptional splicing of a single intron (which we named intron P), in contrast to other core clock transcripts that localize predominantly to the cytoplasm. CRISPR-mediated removal of intron P abolishes nuclear retention of tim transcripts, leading to accelerated TIM protein accumulation and a shortened [~]22-hour period with reduced rhythmic robustness. Remarkably, insertion of intron P alone into heterologous reporters is sufficient to promote nuclear retention in both Drosophila and human cells, acting as a conserved checkpoint that withholds transcripts in the nucleus until splicing is complete. Finally, we identify three RNA-binding proteins, two repressors (Hrb27C and Squid) and one activator (Qkr58E-2, a Sam68 homolog), that modulate intron P splicing in a rheostat-like manner. Together, these findings establish tim intron P as the first intron-based molecular timer in circadian clocks and reveal splicing kinetics as a critical regulatory layer in temporal gene expression programs, with broad implications for other processes such as development and immunity.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.