Joint Spherical-Harmonics Regression for PheWAS: Global Maps, Residual Localization, and Spherical-Cap Enrichment
Rivas, M. A.
Show abstract
We present an application for analyzing variant-by-phenotype association summaries from PheWAS [10] using spherical harmonics (SH) [5, 4]. The method embeds phenotypes onto the unit sphere, fits a joint SH map across all variants via weighted ridge regression [3, 8, 9] with a Laplacian penalty, and then assesses per-variant residual localization beyond this global structure. Rotation-invariant descriptors (degree power spectrum, l95, entropy, and a localization index) summarize spatial complexity. We detect localized genetic effects with a sign-aware spherical-cap enrichment test that scans cap radii around SH extrema and identifies phenotypes driving hotspots via inverse-variance fixed-effect meta-analysis [7]. Model selection uses BIC [2], and significance for high-degree structure uses a nested F-test within the linear-model framework [8, 9] with BH-FDR across variants [1]. The implementation provides 2D maps and an optional 3D globe, supports standard long and matrix data formats, and exports all artifacts in a single ZIP for reproducibility.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- EPISPOT: an epigenome-driven approach for detecting and interpreting hotspots in molecular QTL studies 95%
- Redefining tissue specificity of genetic regulation of gene expression in the presence of allelic heterogeneity 95%
- Characterizing substructure via mixture modeling in large-scale genetic summary statistics 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Testing and controlling for horizontal pleiotropy with the probabilistic Mendelian randomization in transcriptome-wide association studies 95%
- Leveraging information between multiple population groups and traits improves fine-mapping resolution 95%
- A probabilistic graphical model for estimating selection coefficient of nonsynonymous variants from human population sequence data 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.