Bimanual Postural Similarity Facilitates Haptic Memory-Guided Reaching
Camponogara, I.; Volcic, R.
Show abstract
In the visual domain, the precision of memory-guided reaching movements gradually decays as the delay between vision withdrawal and movement onset increases. Such a decrease is often linked to the impact of visual memory decay and the sensory transformation of visual target positional information into haptic-specific coordinates. It is, however, unclear whether this holds for haptically encoded spatial locations, where the target and reaching arm positions are both defined through haptics. Here, we asked participants to perform memory-guided right-handed reaching movements toward targets held with the left hand. In the Delay block, the left hand was removed after 2 seconds, and a right-handed reach was performed after a variable delay of 2, 4, or 6 seconds. In the No-delay block, the left hand was on the target for the entire duration of the trial. Targets were positioned in front (Center) and to the Left of the participants, such that the posture of the left arm during encoding was either the same or different from the final posture of the contralateral reaching arm. The introduction of the shortest delay caused a decrease in accuracy and precision, indicating that on-line haptic inputs play a crucial role in guiding reaching movements. However, performance did not worsen with longer delays, particularly when the two arms were in similar postures. Our findings suggest that postural information may contribute to guiding actions when on-line haptic feedback is unavailable. HighlightsO_LIMemory-guided reaching accuracy in the visual domain declines as the delay between vision and action increases. C_LIO_LIThis study tested whether similar effects occur for haptically encoded spatial locations using right-hand reaches toward left-hand-held targets. C_LIO_LIIntroducing short delays (2 s) reduced accuracy and precision, highlighting the importance of on-line haptic input for movement guidance. C_LIO_LILonger delays (4-6 s) did not further impair performance, particularly when arm postures during encoding and reaching were similar. C_LIO_LIPostural information supports reaching accuracy when real-time haptic feedback is unavailable. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Extended practice improves the accuracy and efficiency of goal-directed reaching guided by supplemental kinesthetic vibrotactile feedback 97%
- Object motion influences feedforward motor responses during mechanical stopping of virtual projectiles: A preliminary study 97%
- Implicit reward-based motor learning 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Asymmetry in kinematic generalisation between visual and passive lead-in movements are consistent with a forward model in the sensorimotor system 98%
- Evidence for an efferent-based prediction contributing to implicit motor adaptation 98%
- Motor Learning Without Moving: Proprioceptive and Predictive Hand Localization After Passive Visuoproprioceptive Discrepancy Training 97%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.