Spatial Dependence and Heterogeneity in Molecular Imaging: Moran Quadrant Maps Enable Advanced Spatial-Statistical Analysis
Tideman, L. E. M.; Moser, F. A.; Migas, L. G.; Spathies, J.; Djambazova, K. V.; Marshall, C. R.; Schrag, M. S.; Skaar, E. P.; Spraggins, J. M.; Van de Plas, R.
Show abstract
Multiplexed molecular imaging, such as imaging mass spectrometry, provides spatially-contextualized insights that are transforming biomedical research by advancing our understanding of tissue organization and disease mechanisms. However, the spatial-statistical properties of molecular imaging data are often underutilized, and scalable computational tools to analyze them are lacking. Here, we demonstrate how local and global spatial autocorrelation (SAC) metrics can be used to quantify spatial dependence and spatial heterogeneity, properties that violate the common assumption of independent and identically distributed measurements. We develop mathematically rigorous methods for SAC-based exploratory analysis. Furthermore, we introduce a novel spatial feature extractor, the Moran quadrant map, and develop two advanced workflows based on it: Moran-Felsenszwalb segmentation for tissue domain segmentation and Moran-HOG clustering for colocalization-based image analysis. Finally, our open-source Moran Imaging toolbox (https://github.com/vandeplaslab/Moran_Imaging) provides scalable Python implementations, including a novel parallelized spatial lag algorithm, unlocking SAC-based analyses and biological insights for large-scale imaging.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The Imaging and Molecular Annotation of Xenografts and Tumours (IMAXT) High Throughput Data and Analysis Infrastructure 94%
- Okapi-EM - a napari plugin for processing and analysing cryogenic serial FIB/SEM images 93%
- Ot2Rec: A Semi-Automatic, Extensible, Multi-Software Tomographic Reconstruction Workflow 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.