Tracking Sleep-Linked Brain Fluid Dynamics Using Modified fNIRS: A Novel Noninvasive Window into Glymphatic Function
Gupta, S.; Amyot, F.; Coon, W. G.; Pollatou, A.; Skeiky, L.; Seenivasan, S.; Kenny, K.; Lee, A.; Lettieri, M.; Penafiel, A.; Yalewayker, S.; Cheraghpour, E.; Sheth, P.; Metzger, E.; Scholl, C.; Werner, J. K.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe glymphatic system, a brain-wide perivascular and interstitial waste and signal transport pathway for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) to exchange with interstitial fluid (ISF), has pronounced activity during non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep and has been implicated in the pathophysiology of traumatic brain injury, Alzheimers disease, and mood disorders. However, direct measurement in humans is limited because current imaging methods rely on intrathecal contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which is unsuitable for routine or naturalistic sleep studies. The absence of real-time, noninvasive monitoring methods that allow for natural sleep poses a major barrier to advancing glymphatic research in clinical settings. MethodsTo address this barrier, we developed a non-invasive functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) forehead array in a wearable headband using non-standard wavelengths to allow for better sensitivity for water measurement. We monitored cortical blood and water dynamics during overnight sleep, quantifying oscillatory patterns of oxyhemoglobin (HbO) and water across sleep stages within the outer layers of the frontal cortex, subarachnoid space, and scalp. A component of the extracted water metrics is hypothesized to serve as a proxy for glymphatic transport without the need for contrast agents or surgical intervention. ResultsOur results demonstrate water concentrations were highest in SWS (d = 1.93, p=0.0002), while HbO concentrations also showed a modest elevation (d = 1.06, ns). Additionally, low-frequency oscillations (LFOs) of both water and HbO signals exhibited distinct dynamics of suprathreshold envelope peak (SEP) frequencies during NREM stages (N2 and N3) as compared to REM and wake, with effect size (d= 1.31, p = 0.003) for water. Interestingly, these water-derived metrics correlate with EEG slow-wave activity, linking fluid-sensitive oscillations to established electrophysiological markers of sleep depth. These findings indicate that water-sensitive oscillatory processes are selectively amplified during deep sleep and scale with EEG-defined sleep depth, consistent with a role for glymphatic-related fluid transport in human sleep. ConclusionWe report novel cortical water shift parameters that are robustly sensitive to sleep stage transitions via a wearable, non-invasive, scalable headband, consistent with predicted glymphatic activity. Future work will cross-validate this method with MRI and other techniques. DisclaimerThe views, information or content, and conclusions presented do not represent the official position or policy of, nor should any official endorsement be inferred on the part of, the Uniformed Services University, the Department of War, the U.S. Government, or Walter Reed National Military Medical Center.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Response of sleep slow oscillations to acoustic stimulation is evidenced by distinctive synchronization processes 96%
- The Aging Slow Wave: A Shifting Amalgam of Distinct Slow Wave and Spindle Coupling Subtypes Define Slow Wave Sleep Across the Human Lifespan 95%
- Sustained polyphasic sleep restriction abolishes human growth hormone release 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Cardiovascular and vasomotor pulsations in the brain and periphery during awake and NREM sleep in a multimodal fMRI study 95%
- The Rise and Fall of Slow Wave Tides: Vacillations of Slow Wave/Spindle Coupling Shift the Composition of Slow Wave Activity Through Sleep Cycles in Accordance with Depth of Sleep 95%
- Night watch during REM sleep for the first-night effect 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.