Polypharmacy and Proton Pump Inhibitor Use Independently Predict One-Year Mortality in Critical COVID-19: An Explainable AI-Based Survival Analysis
Hjärtström, M.; Didriksson, I.; Spangfors, M.; Friberg, H.; Jakobsson, A.; Frigyesi, A.
Show abstract
Mortality among patients admitted to intensive care with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains substantial despite advances in management. The contribution of pre-admission medication profiles to long-term survival is poorly defined. We analysed 497 adults with confirmed COVID-19 admitted to six intensive care units in southern Sweden between May 2020 and May 2021. Clinical and laboratory data were combined with prescription information from the national drug registry; drugs dispensed at least twice within eight months before admission were classified by Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical code. Polypharmacy was defined as the use of five or more medications. An XGBoost survival model with a Cox partial-likelihood objective was trained to predict one-year mortality and interpreted using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). The model achieved a concordance index of 0.74. Age was the strongest predictor of mortality, followed by the number of medications per patient, which ranked above the Charlson Comorbidity Index and Clinical Frailty Scale. Proton pump inhibitors were the only individual drug class among the top predictors, showing a modest positive association with mortality, whereas angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers had negligible contributions. These findings identify cumulative medication burden as an independent and clinically relevant marker of vulnerability in critical COVID-19.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Developing And Validating COVID-19 Adverse Outcome Risk Prediction Models From A Bi-National European Cohort Of 5594 Patients 96%
- Machine learning approach to dynamic risk modeling of mortality in COVID-19: a UK Biobank study 94%
- Personalized survival probabilities for SARS-CoV-2 positive patients by explainable machine learning 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictive performance and clinical application of COV50, a urinary proteomic biomarker in early COVID-19 infection: a cohort study 94%
- Understanding COVID-19 trajectories from a nationwide linked electronic health record cohort of 56 million people: phenotypes, severity, waves & vaccination 93%
- An external validation of the QCovid risk prediction algorithm for risk of mortality from COVID-19 in adults: national validation cohort study in England 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Observational Study of Metformin and Risk of Mortality in Patients Hospitalized with Covid-19 91%
- Modifiable traits, healthy behaviours, and leucocyte telomere length 89%
- Duration of vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV2 infection, hospitalisation, and death in residents and staff of Long-Term Care Facilities (VIVALDI): a prospective cohort study, England, Dec 2020-Dec 2021 88%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of Rosuvastatin plus Colchicine, Emtricitabine/Tenofovir and a combination of them in Hospitalized Patients with SARS Covid-19 91%
- The angiotensin type 2 receptor agonist C21 restores respiratory function in COVID19 - a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled Phase 2 trial 90%
- An Interpretable Machine Learning Tool for In-Home Screening of Agitation Episodes in People Living with Dementia 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.