Back

The Multiple Layers of Childhood Adversity and Premature Mortality: Synthesizing Life-course Data on Individual, Family and Neighborhood Adversity in 1.2 million individuals

Rod, N. H.; Kaer Bennetsen, S.; Elsenburg, L. K.; Sabel, C.; Taylor-Robinson, D.; Kovacs, D.; Zucco, A. G.; de Vries, T. R.

2025-10-28 public and global health
10.1101/2025.10.27.25338857 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundChildhood adversity is multi-layered, extending beyond the family to include broader neighborhood and health contexts. MethodsChildren were followed from birth into young adulthood (16-42 years) using nationwide register data on multi-layered childhood adversity and mortality. Individual adversity included perinatal adversity (preterm or small-for-gestational-age) and mental and physical health service use. Family adversity included five distinct groups using group-based multi-trajectory modelling based on 12 adversities. Neighborhood adversity included material deprivation in small-area geographical zones. We evaluated associations of these layers with all-cause mortality using survival analyses. Findings1,235,519 individuals born between 1980 and 2001, were followed up until Dec 31, 2022, capturing 7,320 deaths. Children facing high family adversity were more likely to have perinatal adversity, use health services, and live in deprived neighborhoods. Each layer separately predicted mortality, with for example high physical health service use (HR: 2.36; 95% CI: 2.24; 2.48) and living in a deprived neighborhood (HR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.14; 1.26) being associated with higher mortality. Cross-layer interactions were most pronounced between family adversity and child health or perinatal adversity. The highest mortality risk was observed among those with both high family and individual adversity: HR: 7.16 (95% CI: 6.40; 8.01) compared to those with low adversity. InterpretationThe co-occurrence and interaction of childhood adversities across different layers can create highly vulnerable groups, deepening lifelong health inequalities. This underscores the importance of a comprehensive, multi-layered approach that targets individual vulnerabilities as well as the broader social environment. FundingThe European Research Council. RESEARCH IN CONTEXTO_ST_ABSEvidence before this studyC_ST_ABSWe searched for relevant studies in PubMed with no language restrictions from inception to March 31, 2025, using the terms (("Childhood adversity" OR "Adverse Childhood Experiences" OR "Early life adversity OR "Perinatal" OR Neighbo*rhood deprivation") and ("[mortality] OR "premature mortality" OR "death" OR "suicide")". We identified studies investigating how individual forms of childhood adversity contribute to the risk of mortality in young adulthood, but only a limited number of studies investigating intersections of different forms of adversity in smaller samples. We also identified several conceptual frameworks that have emphasized the importance of considering multiple, intersecting forms of adversity across developmental contexts. Empirical studies that comprehensively investigate the intersections of multiple forms of adversity simultaneously remain limited. Added value of this studyBy leveraging large-scale, multi-layer life-course data, the study examines emergent patterns of childhood adversity arising from co-occurring and interacting adversities across individual, family, and neighborhood layers, and relate this to mortality in young adulthood. We demonstrate that adversity is not confined to isolated domains: children exposed to family adversity are more likely to experience perinatal complications, health difficulties, and residence in deprived neighborhoods. Importantly, we show that these adversities are not only independently associated with mortality but can also interact across layers, where adversity at one level amplifies the harmful effects of adversity at another. Such cross-layer interactions help identify highly vulnerable subgroups of children who experience multiple interacting adversities already during childhood. Implications of the available evidenceChildhood adversity is a multi-layered phenomenon that cannot be fully understood through single-domain analyses. Our findings suggest that public health and social policies must address adversity more broadly, considering the interplay between individual vulnerability, family adversity, and the structural conditions of the communities in which children grow up. These insights can inform more targeted interventions; from reducing premature births and supporting families in adversity to promoting mental health and tackling broader social determinants such as poverty, education, and neighborhood conditions. By adopting a multi-layered, life course approach to childhood adversity, health and social systems can better identify and support highly vulnerable subgroups of children facing adversity, ultimately reducing intergenerational cycles of disadvantage.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.4%
2
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.1%
3
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.3%
5
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
7
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.1%
9
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
10
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 26%
2.3%
12
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.1%
13
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
14
JAMA Pediatrics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
15
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
16
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.2%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 54%
0.9%
20
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
21
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
23
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
24
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
26
Developmental Science
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
27
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
28
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
30
International Journal of Public Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%