Back

Computational Design and Biophysical Validation of Macrocyclic Peptides as Inhibitors of SLIT2/ROBO1 interaction

Abdel-Rahman, S.; Delaunay, M.; Ha-Duong, T.; Gabr, M.

2025-10-27 biophysics
10.1101/2025.10.26.684696 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The SLIT2/ROBO1 signaling axis regulates cellular migration and angiogenesis but also contributes to tumor progression and immune evasion in glioblastoma. Targeting this pathway with small molecules or antibodies remains challenging due to the shallow and extended nature of the SLIT2/ROBO1 interface. Here, we report the first computational design and experimental validation of macrocyclic peptides that inhibit SLIT2/ROBO1 binding. Twenty peptides were generated through a structure-guided interface mapping approach (Des3PI 2.0) and ranked using a contact-based scoring function. The top candidates were synthesized and evaluated using time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer (TR-FRET) and biolayer interferometry (BLI) assays. Among the SLIT2-targeting peptides, SP4 and SP3 showed the most pronounced inhibition in TR-FRET and BLI, confirming direct binding to the SLIT2/ROBO1 interface. The lead peptide SP4 also demonstrated favorable in vitro pharmacokinetic properties, including strong stability in simulated intestinal fluid, high plasma integrity, and moderate metabolic stability in rat liver microsomes. Collectively, this work establishes a computational-to-experimental pipeline for discovering macrocyclic peptides that disrupt challenging protein-protein interactions and provides a foundation for developing next-generation SLIT2/ROBO1 modulators for cancer and neuroimmune disorders. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=54 SRC="FIGDIR/small/684696v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (27K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@e011f7org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@bb8e5aorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@17ec46corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1919666_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.3%
2
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
3
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
68 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
4
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
10.1%
5
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.8%
6
Chemistry – A European Journal
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
ACS Central Science
66 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
8
ACS Chemical Biology
150 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
9
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.1%
10
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.7%
12
Chemical Communications
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
13
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 36%
2.1%
15
JACS Au
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
16
Structure
175 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
17
Communications Chemistry
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
18
Cell Chemical Biology
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
19
RSC Chemical Biology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.2%
21
Angewandte Chemie
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
22
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Theranostics
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
Nature Chemistry
34 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
26
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.7%
27
Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%