Back

Phase separation as a tunable regulator of canonical gene regulatory motifs

Chakraborty, P.; Nandi, M.; Choubey, S.

2025-10-27 biophysics
10.1101/2025.10.26.684618 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Gene regulatory networks govern essential cellular processes such as signal transduction, metabolism, and cell fate control. Within these networks, canonical motifs such as genetic toggle switches and repressilators serve as building blocks that generate bistable and oscillatory behaviors. An open question is how cells regulate the dynamical behavior of such motifs, both in natural contexts and in synthetic systems. Recent studies highlight phase separation of transcription factors (TFs) and nucleic acids as a key organizing principle of intracellular biochemistry. In this work, we explore how phase separation of TFs influences the dynamics of toggle switch and repressilator using mean-field theory and stochastic simulations. Our mean-field analysis reveals that phase separation reshapes motif dynamics by altering fixed-point stability and basin geometry in toggle switch, and by altering oscillatory cycles in repressilator. A key finding for both motifs is that when multiple TFs undergo phase separation, the one with the lowest saturation concentration for phase separation dominates system dynamics. Interestingly, stochastic simulations show that the impact of phase separation on fluctuations (or noise) in the abundance of transcription factors within network motifs is architecture-dependent and sharply contrasts with its buffering effect on noise in the expression of isolated genes. Overall, our results show that biomolecular phase separation acts as a physical principle for tuning stability and noise in gene regulatory networks, providing new insights into cellular decision-making.

Published in Journal of the Royal Society Interface · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.