Back

Tumor-on-Chip as a Personalised Platform for Rapid Drug-Testing in Breast Cancer

Helal, C.; Pinon, L.; Jin, J.; Schintu, N.; Vasquez, A.; Nurmik, M.; Antonelli, G.; Simon, M.; Montaudon, E.; Sourd, L.; Derrien, H.; Zalcman, G.; Bellini, A.; Goncalves, A.; Vincent-Salomon, A.; Ramtohul, T.; Marangoni, E.; PARRINI, M. C.; Cabel, L.; Descroix, S.

2025-10-27 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.10.26.684605 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Breast cancer (BC) remains one of the most common malignancies worldwide and continues to pose major therapeutic challenges, emphasizing the need for functional models that can inform fast treatment selection. Currently, patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) and organoids (PDOs) are valuable biological models for functional precision oncology; however, variable success rates of establishment and prolonged timelines limit their clinical application for real-time drug testing. To overcome this, we developed a Tumor-on-Chip (ToC) platform that enables functional drug sensitivity profiling within a clinically actionable 4-day timeframe. We compared ToC models with PDX results, and demonstrated high reproducibility and strong concordance with in vivo PDX responses. Drug sensitivity was correctly identified ex vivo in 88% of PDX-responsive cases, while resistance was detected in 91%, with no false positives at clinically relevant drug concentrations. To facilitate clinical translation, we engineered a custom microfluidic chip optimized for minimal breast cancer biopsy material, yielding results similar to those obtained from resection samples. We ultimately demonstrated the proof-of-concept for applying this platform to patient samples as a further tool for guiding clinical decision-making and discriminated between resistance and sensitive profiles among patients. These findings demonstrate the feasibility and translational potential of ToC models for personalized drug profiling in breast cancer, laying the groundwork for their integration into real-time clinical decision-making workflows.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.