Tumor-on-Chip as a Personalised Platform for Rapid Drug-Testing in Breast Cancer
Helal, C.; Pinon, L.; Jin, J.; Schintu, N.; Vasquez, A.; Nurmik, M.; Antonelli, G.; Simon, M.; Montaudon, E.; Sourd, L.; Derrien, H.; Zalcman, G.; Bellini, A.; Goncalves, A.; Vincent-Salomon, A.; Ramtohul, T.; Marangoni, E.; PARRINI, M. C.; Cabel, L.; Descroix, S.
Show abstract
Breast cancer (BC) remains one of the most common malignancies worldwide and continues to pose major therapeutic challenges, emphasizing the need for functional models that can inform fast treatment selection. Currently, patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) and organoids (PDOs) are valuable biological models for functional precision oncology; however, variable success rates of establishment and prolonged timelines limit their clinical application for real-time drug testing. To overcome this, we developed a Tumor-on-Chip (ToC) platform that enables functional drug sensitivity profiling within a clinically actionable 4-day timeframe. We compared ToC models with PDX results, and demonstrated high reproducibility and strong concordance with in vivo PDX responses. Drug sensitivity was correctly identified ex vivo in 88% of PDX-responsive cases, while resistance was detected in 91%, with no false positives at clinically relevant drug concentrations. To facilitate clinical translation, we engineered a custom microfluidic chip optimized for minimal breast cancer biopsy material, yielding results similar to those obtained from resection samples. We ultimately demonstrated the proof-of-concept for applying this platform to patient samples as a further tool for guiding clinical decision-making and discriminated between resistance and sensitive profiles among patients. These findings demonstrate the feasibility and translational potential of ToC models for personalized drug profiling in breast cancer, laying the groundwork for their integration into real-time clinical decision-making workflows.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Low-Cost Robotic Manipulation of Live Microtissues for Cancer Drug Testing 94%
- Dual-Mode Microfluidic Immunostaining (Dumi) Device for Diagnostic Biomarkers Detection and Tumor Microenvironment Evaluation 93%
- Integrating Single-Cell Biophysical and Transcriptomic Features to Resolve Functional Heterogeneity in Mantle Cell Lymphoma 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multiplexed RNA-FISH-guided Laser Capture Microdissection RNA Sequencing Improves Breast Cancer Molecular Subtyping, Prognostic Classification, and Predicts Response to Antibody Drug Conjugates 95%
- Measuring kinetics and metastatic propensity of CTCs by blood exchange between mice 94%
- Anti-CSF-1R therapy with combined immuno- chemotherapy coordinate an adaptive immune response to eliminate macrophage enriched Triple Negative Breast Cancers 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Three-dimensional drug screen identifies HDAC inhibitors as therapeutic agents in mTORC1-driven lymphangioleiomyomatosis 93%
- Chromatin Remodeling in Patient-Derived Colorectal Cancer Models 92%
- Circulating tumor cells shed shearosome extracellular vesicles in capillary bifurcations that activate endothelial and immune cells 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- BLM overexpression as a predictive biomarker for CHK1 inhibitor response in PARP inhibitor–resistant BRCA-mutant ovarian cancer 92%
- Effective Combination Immunotherapy using Oncolytic Viruses to Deliver CAR Targets to Solid Tumors 91%
- Analysis of fragment ends in plasma DNA from patients with cancer 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Acoustogenetic Control of CAR T Cells via Focused Ultrasound 92%
- Collagen-binding IL-12 expressing STEAP1 CAR-T cells reduce toxicity and eradicate mouse prostate cancer in combination with checkpoint inhibitors 91%
- High-density microbioreactor process designed for automated point-of-care manufacturing of CAR T cells 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.