Back

Factors influencing English general practitioners referrals to specialist sleep services: a qualitative study using the COM-B model

Sykorova, M.; van Someren, F.; Veighey, K.; Nolte, E.; Warren-Gash, C.; Miller, M. A.; Eriksson, S. H.; Smith, I. E.; Strongman, H.

2025-10-28 primary care research
10.1101/2025.10.26.25338808
Show abstract

TitleFactors influencing English general practitioners referrals to specialist sleep services: a qualitative study using the COM-B model ObjectivesThis study explored the factors influencing access to sleep services for individuals with symptoms of OSA and narcolepsy, from the perspective of general practitioners (GP). MethodsA qualitative interview study was conducted with GPs within three areas of England: South London, East Midlands or South West England to explore their views on factors influencing referrals to specialist sleep services. The semi-structured interviews were conducted between November 2024 and April 2025 using an interview guide informed by published research and the COM-B model of behaviour change; this model proposed that Capability (C), Opportunity (O), and Motivation (M) are needed for behaviour (B) change to occur. Data were analysed using exploratory thematic analysis informed by the COM-B model using an iterative approach. ResultsWe conducted 31 interviews, mostly online, with one conducted face-to-face. Our data suggest that the most important factors shaping referral to sleep services are limited capacity of NHS sleep services, limited referral pathways for narcolepsy, inflexible referral pathways for OSA, and limited knowledge of narcolepsy. ConclusionsThis qualitative study with GPs in England highlights that, although sleep disorders are a common concern, the current healthcare system provides limited support for GPs in managing these conditions. Fundamental sleep medicine service reforms are needed to improve referral pathways. These reforms should be guided by data-driven research that assesses current services in relation to population health needs and evaluates the potential health and economic benefits of expanding service capacity.

Matching journals

1
Journal of Sleep Research
Wiley · based on 14 published papers
#1
244× avg
2
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 6%
3.8× avg
3
British Journal of General Practice
Royal College of General Practitioners · based on 22 published papers
Top 0.2%
111× avg
4
BJGP Open
Royal College of General Practitioners · based on 12 published papers
#1
141× avg
5
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 52%
9.5%
6
BMC Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 155 published papers
Top 2%
7.4× avg
7
ERJ Open Research
European Respiratory Society (ERS) · based on 36 published papers
Top 1%
17× avg
8
Journal of Medical Internet Research
JMIR Publications Inc. · based on 81 published papers
Top 7%
3.7× avg
9
Thorax
BMJ · based on 29 published papers
Top 1.0%
19× avg
10
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
BMJ · based on 32 published papers
Top 1%
12× avg
11
Health Expectations
Wiley · based on 12 published papers
Top 0.7%
22× avg
12
Wellcome Open Research
F1000 Research Ltd · based on 34 published papers
Top 2%
7.7× avg
13
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
MDPI AG · based on 116 published papers
Top 18%
1.6× avg
14
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 19 published papers
Top 3%
5.9× avg
15
BMC Health Services Research
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 43 published papers
Top 4%
4.3× avg
16
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Elsevier BV · based on 10 published papers
Top 0.7%
16× avg
17
Frontiers in Neurology
Frontiers Media SA · based on 74 published papers
Top 10%
0.9%
18
JMIR Research Protocols
JMIR Publications Inc. · based on 18 published papers
Top 4%
5.0× avg
19
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 12 published papers
Top 2%
11× avg
20
SLEEP
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 11 published papers
Top 1.0%
15× avg