Characterising trajectories of social transition in a cohort of gender diverse Australian children and adolescents
Conabere, W.; Buckingham, P.; Martin, S.; Pang, K. C.; Tollit, M. A.
Show abstract
BackgroundSocial transition, defined as all outward changes in gender expression to align with and affirm ones gender identity, has been richly described in qualitative studies, but quantitative research often lacks the detail required to capture its full complexity. To date, no studies have quantitatively examined how this process varies in young people over time. MethodsLongitudinal data were obtained from 234 trans and gender diverse Australian young people (ages 8-17) attending a specialist paediatric gender service across at least two annual waves from 2017 to 2024. Social transition was operationalised using three practices (name, pronouns, and appearance) across five contexts (home, school, online, with friends, and extended family). For each practice, we captured the contexts in which a change had been enacted or was desired in the future. FindingsMost young people reported changes to their enacted social transition (73.9%) and adjustments in their social transition goals (60.7%) over time. Grouping of participants with similar social transition trajectories identified that most (78.6%) met their goals by the final wave, while many of those who had not were still progressing toward them (50.0%). Progress varied by gender, with trans boys significantly more likely than trans girls to meet their social transition goals. ConclusionIn our longitudinal clinical cohort of gender diverse young people, social transition encompassed diverse practices, contexts, and goals, which evolved over time. Despite this variability, clusters of trajectories emerged, indicating that groups of young people can follow similar patterns, while maintaining unique experiences.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Social and Mental Health Pathways to Institutional Trust: A Cohort Study 93%
- Loneliness during strict lockdown: trajectories and predictors during the COVID-19 pandemic in 38,217 adults in the UK 91%
- A review of the effectiveness and experiences of welfare advice services co-located in health settings: a critical narrative systematic review 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- How a year of pandemic and related public health measures impacted youth and young adults and the foundations they build upon: Qualitative interviews in Ontario Canada 94%
- Intentional and unintentional non-adherence to social distancing measures during COVID-19: A mixed-methods analysis 93%
- Co-production of an online research and resource platform for improving the health of young people - The HYPE Project 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- How young people experienced Long COVID services: a qualitative analysis 91%
- Reducing Covid-19 risk in schools: a qualitative examination of staff and family views and concerns 90%
- Early activity and impact of a neighbourhood multidisciplinary team that integrates health, and social support for underserved children and young people in Birmingham, UK: an observational study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Longitudinal effect of gestational age on the developmental trajectory of social competence difficulties from early childhood to mid-adolescence: Evidence from the UK Millennium Cohort 92%
- Deficits in planned hospital care for vulnerable adolescents in England during the COVID-19 pandemic: analysis of linked administrative data 89%
- ‘Admissions to paediatric medical wards with a primary mental health diagnosis: a systematic review of the literature’ 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mental health self-care during the COVID-19 pandemic: A prospective cohort study in Australia 92%
- Time trends in social contacts before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: the CONNECT study 91%
- Feasibility and acceptability of daily testing at school as an alternative to self-isolation following close contact with a confirmed case of COVID-19: A qualitative analysis 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.