Back

A machine learning framework for supervised treatment response prediction from tumor transcriptomics: A large-scale pan-cancer study

Pal, L. R.; Gertz, E. M.; Ulhas Nair, N.; Mukherjee, S.; Patiyal, S.; Cantore, T.; Campagnolo, E. M.; Chang, T.; Dhruba, S. R.; Kim, Y.; Shulman, E. D.; Rajagopal, P. S.; Hoang, D.-T.; Schaffer, A. A.; Ruppin, E.

2025-11-14 cancer biology
10.1101/2025.10.24.684491 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Precision oncology aims to guide treatment decisions using biomarkers. While DNA-based panels are increasingly applied, RNA transcriptomics remain underused due to limited datasets and the absence of robust models. We assembled the largest transcriptomic resource for drug response prediction to date, spanning 69 cohorts, 3,729 patients, nine cancer types, and six frontline therapies: anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immune-checkpoint inhibitors, trastuzumab, bevacizumab, BRAF inhibitors, paclitaxel, and FAC/FEC (Fluorouracil-Adriamycin-Cyclophosphamide/Fluorouracil-Epirubicin-Cyclophosphamide) chemotherapy. We developed EXPRESSO (EXpression-Profile-RESponSe-Optimizer), a supervised machine-learning framework that predicts treatment response from pre-treatment transcriptomes by integrating drug targets and context-specific biomarkers. EXPRESSO achieves ROC-AUCs of 0.64-0.73 and odds ratios of 2.4-4.6 across therapies, outperforming 20 published transcriptomic signatures. Robustness analysis reveals that predictive performance plateaued for some therapies with increasing training cohorts but continued to improve for others. These findings suggest inherent limits of supervised brute-force learning for certain treatments, but additional data and deeper mechanistic modeling may further enhance transcriptomics-based predictors.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Cancer
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.8%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 9%
18.3%
3
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.8%
4
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.0%
6
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
7
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
8
Cancer Cell
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
9
Cancer Discovery
66 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.4%
10
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
11
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
75 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.7%
13
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.1%
15
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.1%
16
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.0%
17
Cancer Research Communications
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.0%
19
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
20
npj Breast Cancer
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
21
Nature Genetics
286 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 75%
0.8%
23
Cell Genomics
172 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
25
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.8%
26
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
27
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
29
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.6%