Back

Aromatic residues in mobile regions distal to the active site support the closed conformation of E. coli DXPS

Kramer, L. J.; Austin, S. L.; Majumdar, A.; Smith, N. D.; Woodcock, H. L.; Freel Meyers, C. L.

2025-11-19 biochemistry
10.1101/2025.10.24.684457 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The essential bacterial enzyme 1-deoxy-D-xylulose 5-phosphate synthase (DXPS) is absent in humans, making the enzyme an attractive antimicrobial target. Its product DXP sits at a metabolic branchpoint between the biosynthesis of pyridoxal phosphate (PLP), thiamin diphosphate (ThDP), and isoprenoids. DXP is formed via decarboxylation of pyruvate and subsequent carboligation with D-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate (D-GAP) in a ThDP-dependent manner. In the current mechanistic model, DXPS follows a ligand-gated mechanism. Pyruvate reacts with ThDP to form C2-lactylThDP (LThDP) which coincides with a shift to a closed conformation. The flexible "spoon" and "fork" motifs become ordered, situating the catalytic residue H299 within the active site which supports LThDP persistence and the closed conformation of the E-LThDP complex until binding of D-GAP. Our goal is to understand the molecular basis for stabilization of the E-LThDP complex in its closed conformation in the absence of D-GAP. We propose the conserved aromatic residues Y288, F298, and F304 in the E. coli DXPS spoon and fork motifs form a cluster upon transition from the open to closed form to position H299 within the active site, necessary for LThDP persistence. Here, we conducted mutagenesis studies to elucidate the roles of Y288, F298, and F304 in conformational cycling and catalysis. On each variant, the conformational equilibrium favored an open state, hindered intermediate formation and persistence, and promoted intermediate release from the active site. Our results support a model in which conserved aromatic residues within the mobile, sequence-diverse spoon and fork motifs promote the closed conformation and support catalysis.

Published in Biochemistry (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.