Back

Direct and diffuse cross-kingdom interactions in plant microbiome assembly

Hammer, R. A.; Lee, M. R.; Kimbrel, J.; Stuart, R.; Hawkes, C. V.

2026-03-06 ecology
10.1101/2025.10.24.684285 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Studies of plant-associated microbial communities consistently indicate a role for classic assembly mechanisms, such as environmental and host filters, but often leave substantial unexplained variation. Biotic interactions within microbial communities may help to fill this gap, specifically cross-kingdom interactions between fungi and bacteria, as these are increasingly found to be important to both assembly and function. We hypothesized that direct interactions between bacteria and fungi are an important driver of composition in low-diversity leaf habitats, where pairwise interactions are more likely. In high-diversity root habitats, we expected diffuse, indirect interactions to be more relevant to composition. To test these hypotheses, we characterized bacterial and fungal communities of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) leaves and roots at 14 sites spanning mountain to coastal ecoregions of North Carolina, USA. We analyzed putative direct and diffuse interactions using ecological network inference and partitioned variance explained in microbial community composition by spatial, environmental, and biotic interactions. We found that cross-kingdom biotic interactions contributed to microbial community structure. The largest improvements to variance explained (5-11%) were from direct interactions, except for root fungal communities where diffuse interactions (7.5%) explained more than double that of direct interactions (2.8%). These contributions were comparable to those from environmental and spatial factors. The joint effects of putative biotic interactions and environmental conditions also contributed to the explained variation, highlighting the importance of environmental tracking in microbes. These findings suggest that using network inference for identifying cross-kingdom ecological interactions can improve our fundamental understanding of how plant-associated microbiomes assemble, which is also directly relevant to applied efforts such as the effective development of synthetic communities.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
21.8%
2
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 1%
8.2%
3
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.2%
4
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.7%
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.5%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 28%
3.5%
7
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 23%
3.2%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.5%
10
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.5%
11
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
12
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
13
Environmental Microbiome
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
14
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.8%
15
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.8%
16
Plant and Soil
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
17
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
19
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
20
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
56 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
21
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
22
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
23
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.1%
24
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.9%
25
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
26
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.9%
27
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
28
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
29
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.7%
30
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%