Back

Biologically informed neural network models are robust to spurious interactions via self-pruning

Nordenstorm, O.; Baghdassarian, H.; Lauffenburger, D. A.; Nilsson, A.

2025-10-27 systems biology
10.1101/2025.10.24.684155 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Computational models of cellular networks hold promise to uncover disease mechanisms and guide therapeutic strategies. Biology-informed neural networks (BINNs) is an emerging approach to create such models by combining the predictive power of deep learning with prior knowledge, a vital aspect of biological research. The architectures of BINNs enforces a network structure from which mechanism can ideally be inferred. However, a key challenge is to evaluate the reliability of these mechanisms, as cells are inherently complex, involving intricate and sometimes unknown interactions. Currently, analysis mainly focuses on selected pathways rather than a more comprehensive perspective. In this work we demonstrate an improved, holistic approach: we measure to which extent purposefully introduced spurious interactions are removed by a BINN during training (self-pruning). This metric is scalable and generalizable, as it does not depend on manual curation and can be translated into diverse network settings. To enable rapid testing, we reimplemented LEMBAS (Large-scale knowledge-EMBedded Artificial Signaling-networks), our recurrent neural network framework for intracellular signaling dynamics, with full GPU acceleration. Our implementation achieves a >7-fold speedup compared to the original while preserving predictive accuracy. We evaluated self-pruning in 3 different datasets and found that when spurious interactions are introduced at random, the model prunes these to a larger extent than those from the prior knowledge network (PKN), provided the model is regularized with a sufficiently large L2 norm. This suggests that BINNs are robust to uncertainty in the PKN and is a quantitative sign that they could model real aspects of the systems. Our implementation of LEMBAS is freely available under a MIT license at https://github.com/AvlantNilssonLab/LEMBAS_GPU. The models and results to generate the figures can be downloaded through https://zenodo.org/records/17425598.

Published in Bioinformatics (predicted rank #2) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.