Back

Cell-free DNA Whole Genome Sequencing for Non-Invasive Minimal Residual Disease Detection in Multiple Myeloma

Abelman, D. D.; Eagles, J.; Wong, A.; Shah, S.; Bruce, J. P.; Pedersen, S.; Scott, D. S.; Bonolo de Campos, C.; Chow, S.; Wei, E. N.; Abdulsalam, S.; White, D.; Sandhu, I.; Song, K.; Braggio, E.; Kumar, S.; Murugesan, A.; Reiman, A.; Stewart, A. K.; Trudel, S.; Pugh, T. J.

2025-10-27 oncology
10.1101/2025.10.24.25338566 medRxiv
Show abstract

Minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring in multiple myeloma (MM) relies on invasive bone marrow (BM) biopsies, which often yield insufficient tumor material. We performed whole genome sequencing of cell-free DNA from 163 plasma samples from 51 patients to develop a non-invasive MRD classifier. BM WGS identified a median of 2,502 clonal mutations, enabling cfDNA tracking at levels comparable to BM-based MRD testing. The cfDNA classifier achieved a mean AUC of 0.86 against multiparameter flow cytometry and targeted immunoglobulin sequencing (clonoSEQ), and MRD negativity after one year of maintenance was strongly associated with two-year relapse-free survival probability (Hazard Ratio = 24), with cfDNA changes preceding clinical progression by a median of 12.6 months. To establish a BM-agnostic mode, a plasma-only classifier trained on baseline cfDNA established a mean AUC of 0.79 compared to BM clinical testing and stratified relapse risk (HR = 4.18), enabling MRD detection in patients with suboptimal BM samples. Longitudinal cfDNA profiles detected subclonal evolution in half of profiled patients. Cell-free DNA whole genome sequencing provides a sensitive, scalable, and clinically informative platform for non-invasive MRD monitoring in MM. Statement of Translational SignificanceCurrently, myeloma MRD assays require invasive, painful bone marrow sampling and fail to account for spatial heterogeneity. High-depth, cell-free whole genome sequencing tracks thousands of personalized mutations in blood, identifying molecular relapse a median of 12.6-19 months before clinical progression and showing a stronger association with progression-free survival than standard bone-marrow tests (hazard ratio = 24 for BM-informed mutation lists). This scalable, comprehensive approach enables dynamic multiple myeloma monitoring and risk-adapted treatment. Summary ParagraphMinimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring is one of the strongest predictors of progression-free and overall survival in multiple myeloma (MM); as such, clinicians currently rely on invasive bone-marrow sampling that patients tolerate poorly for serial assessment. We show that longitudinal whole-genome sequencing of plasma cell-free DNA, guided by personalized mutation catalogs from diagnostic bone marrow, detects residual tumor DNA at ultra-low levels. This approach tracked disease dynamics across serial samples, achieved strong concordance with standard clinical MRD assays, accurately predicted progression-free survival, and detected subclonal evolution driving relapse. While developed initially using bone marrow reference, we found that cell-free DNA collected at baseline provided comparable mutational information to serve as a reference for subsequent MRD blood draws. This plasma-only classifier requires no marrow input, identified persistent disease when diagnostic marrow was insufficient for referencing, stratified relapse risk, and detected rising MRD probabilities a median of 19 months before progression. Together, these results establish cell-free DNA whole genome sequencing as a minimally invasive platform for comprehensive genomic surveillance in MM, reducing dependence on painful repeat marrow biopsies and enabling earlier, risk-adapted intervention. More broadly, this strategy can extend to diverse cancers to guide personalized therapy and identify relapse earlier.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 12%
13.9%
2
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.9%
3
Cancer Discovery
61 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
4
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
5
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
8.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Leukemia
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.7%
7
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
8
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
9
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.1%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 30%
3.0%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 24%
2.8%
12
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
13
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Journal of Hematology & Oncology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
15
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.6%
16
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.3%
17
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
18
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
19
Blood
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
Cell Stem Cell
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Haematologica
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.7%
23
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.7%
24
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
25
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
26
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%