Stepwise explorative model to determine pathogenicity of cultured blood isolates
Sahu, S. N.; Panda, P. K.; Bairwa, M.; Sharma, P.; Omar, B. J.; Saran, M.; Sahu, P. S.
Show abstract
Blood culture remains the gold standard for diagnosing bloodstream infections (BSIs); however, distinguishing true pathogens from contaminants remains a critical challenge. Misclassification can lead to inappropriate antimicrobial use, prolonged hospitalization, and increased healthcare burden. This study proposes a structured, stepwise clinical-pathological model to differentiate pathogenic from non-pathogenic organisms in blood cultures. In this prospective study at a tertiary hospital in northern India, 205 blood culture-positive adults were evaluated between August and October 2024. Organisms were classified as pathogenic or non-pathogenic using microbiological data and clinical indicators, including SOFA score, time to positivity, and site concordance, through a seven-step algorithm with 28-day outcome follow-up. Among 1600 blood culture samples received, 205 isolates were positive for an organism, 160 (78.0%) were identified as pathogenic and 45 (22.0%) as non-pathogenic. The most common pathogens were Klebsiella pneumoniae (20.0%), Acinetobacter baumannii (9.3%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (6.3%), while non-pathogens were mainly coagulase-negative staphylococci (CONS, 18.5%) and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (8.3%). Mean Time to Positivity (TTP) was significantly shorter in pathogens (16.3 {+/-} 8.0 hours) compared to non-pathogens (21.5 {+/-} 10.1 hours; p < 0.001). Discordance was observed in 7 cases (3.4%) where clinicians labelled isolates as non-pathogens but microbiologists disagreed, and in 26 cases (12.7%) with the opposite interpretation. Overall agreement was 65.4%, with a Cohens kappa of 0.25, indicating fair inter-rater reliability. This stepwise clinical-microbiological model offers an effective framework for distinguishing pathogens from non-pathogens in BSIs. Incorporating SOFA score, TTP, and culture concordance enhances diagnostic stewardship, informs antimicrobial decisions, and supports prognostication, especially in resource-limited and high-burden healthcare settings.
Matching journals
The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Multi-drug resistance bacteria predict mortality in blood stream infection in a tertiary setting in Tanzania 95%
- A Sepsis Treatment Algorithm to Improve Early Antibiotic De-escalation While Maintaining Adequacy of Coverage (Early-IDEAS): A Prospective Observational Study 95%
- Two original observations concerning bacterial infections in COVID-19 patients hospitalized in intensive care units during the first wave of the epidemic in France 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of flow cytometry for cell count and detection of bacteria in biological fluids. 95%
- Antimicrobial Susceptibilities of Clinical Bacterial Isolates from Urinary Tract Infections to Fosfomycin and Comparator Antibiotics Determined by Agar Dilution Method and Automated Micro Broth Dilution 94%
- Comparative Diagnostic Evaluation of Real-Time PCR and Culture for Detecting Pathogens in Podiatric Wound Infections 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Less Haste, More Speed: Does delayed blood culture loading lead to adverse incubation time or yield? 95%
- Improved pathogen identification in sepsis or septic shock by clinical metagenomic sequencing 94%
- Novel risk factors for Coronavirus disease-associated mucormycosis (CAM): a case control study during the outbreak in India 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Immune Profiling Panel: a proof of concept study of a new multiplex molecular tool to assess the immune status of critically-ill patients 92%
- In vivo evolution of Candida auris multi-drug resistance in a patient receiving antifungal treatment 92%
- Retrospective Analysis of Blood Biomarkers of Neurological Injury in Human Cases of Viral Infection and Bacterial Sepsis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Unyvero Hospital-Acquired pneumonia panel for diagnosis of secondary bacterial pneumonia in COVID-19 patients 94%
- Hunting Eagles with glass mice: revisiting the inoculum effect for Streptococcus pyogenes with a hollow fibre infection model 94%
- Antibiotic De-escalation Patterns and Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients with Suspected Pneumonia as Informed by Bronchoalveolar Lavage Results 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.