The Real-World Costs of GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Treatment
Wennberg, D.; Coetzer, H.; Marr, A.; Margiotta, C.; Hashmi, R.; Kay, J.; Vats, V.; Hagen, S.; Anatale-Tardiff, L.; Rao, S.; Mugiishi, M.; Skinner, J.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe high cost and widespread use of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are a concern for healthcare budgets. Whether GLP-1RA use reduces other health care spending is unclear. MethodsWe conducted a cohort study using insurance claims data for United States adults aged 18-64 from 2016-2024, matching GLP-1RA treated members with untreated members (controls) on baseline demographics, clinical conditions, hospitalization, and medication use. Primary outcomes were per member per month (PMPM) healthcare costs overall and by service type, analyzed separately for members with and without diabetes. ResultsAmong 742,824 matched treated and control members, 55.6% had diabetes. In year 1 following GLP-1RA initiation, total costs were 68.7% higher in treated members (95% CI, 68.0%-69.4%, $743 PMPM difference); in years 2-6 costs were 44.8% higher (95% CI, 43.7%-45.9%; $530 PMPM difference). Excluding GLP-1RA costs, treated members had 5.8% higher costs in year 1 (95% CI 5.1%-6.5%) and 4.1% higher costs (95% CI 3.0% - 5.2%) in years 2-6. Among treated members with diabetes, cost increases were modest: 3.8% (95% CI 2.8% - 4.8%) in year 1 and 0.8% in years 2-6 (95% CI 0.6%-2.2%), with non-GLP-1RA pharmacy and provider visits offset by reduced admissions and dialysis. Treated members without diabetes had more substantial cost increases: 8.9% in year 1 (95% CI 7.7% - 10.1%) and 9.7% in years 2-6 (95% CI 8.0% - 11.4%). ConclusionsGLP-1RA treatment was associated with increases in spending on healthcare net of the GLP-1RA cost, particularly in members without diabetes. Key PointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSWhat are the real-world costs of GLP-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) treatment for adults with diabetes and other conditions? FindingsGLP-1RAs treatment is associated with substantially increased healthcare costs. Excluding the costs of GLP-1RAs, treated adults with diabetes have modest increases in costs; however, those treated without diabetes have costs that are.9% higher than those not receiving the drug. MeaningMedical costs of using GLP-1RAs for those without diabetes go far beyond the costs of the agents. An estimated 40% of the US adult population are eligible for treatment for obesity. Treating them with GLP-1RAs would have a substantial impact on insurance costs.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Trends in weight gain recorded in English primary care before and during the Coronavirus-19 pandemic: an observational cohort study using the OpenSAFELY platform 91%
- Differential impact of Covid-19 on incidence of diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular diseases in acute, post-acute and long Covid-19: population-based cohort study in the United Kingdom 90%
- Robust causal inference for long-term policy decisions: cost effectiveness of interventions for obesity using Mendelian randomization 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of healthcare resource use and cost between influenza and COVID-19 vaccine coadministration and influenza vaccination only 90%
- Reflex single-gene non-invasive prenatal testing significantly increases the cost-effectiveness of carrier screening 87%
- Modeling the Cost-Effectiveness of the Next-Generation COVID-19 mRNA-1283 Vaccine in the United States 86%
Similar papers in this journal
- Use of semaglutide and risk of non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy: A Danish-Norwegian cohort study 95%
- Treatment outcomes with oral anti-hyperglycaemic therapies in people with diabetes secondary to a pancreatic condition (type 3c diabetes): A population-based cohort study 93%
- Effects of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors and Sulfonylureas on Cognitive and Physical Function in Nursing Home Residents 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association of Periodic Fasting with Lower Severity of COVID-19 Outcomes in the SARS-CoV-2 Pre-Vaccine Era: An Observational Cohort from the INSPIRE Registry 88%
- Genetically predicted serum vitamin D and COVID-19: a Mendelian randomization study 88%
- Impact of a Multidisciplinary Nutritional Support Team (MNST) on Quality Improvement in Home Parenteral Nutrition (HPN) 86%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.