Back

Dynamic and task-dependent decoding of the human attentional spotlight from MEG

Mostafalu, M.; Clausner, T.; Ferez, M.; Shelepenkov, D.; Daligault, S.; Schwartz, D.; Mattout, J.; Ben Hamed, S.; Bonnefond, M.

2026-06-24 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.10.23.684150 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Attention is a fundamental mechanism enabling the brain to overcome its limited capacity for parallel processing. In non-human primates, invasive electrophysiology has shown that attentional selection operates rhythmically, primarily within the alpha ([~]8-12 Hz) and theta ([~]4-5 Hz) bands. Whether such finely resolved control signals can be captured non-invasively in humans, and how they adapt to changing task demands, remains unclear. Using high-precision magnetoencephalography (MEG) combined with machine learning, we decoded the spatial locus of covert attention in humans performing three variants of a spatial cueing task that manipulated cue validity as well invalid trial switching rules. Spatial attention could be decoded from whole-brain MEG activity at both static and time-resolved scales, with accuracies significantly above chance (N = 30). Decoding performance decreased as cue validity was reduced, indicating that task structure shapes attentional engagement. Analysis of decoding trajectories revealed rhythmic fluctuations at [~]8-12 Hz across all tasks, demonstrating alpha-band sampling of attention. Pre-target attention became increasingly focused on the cued side, especially in the 100% Valid condition, consistent with proactive orienting. Furthermore, individual and task-specific differences in decoding strength correlated with task-variations in behavioral performance, linking the accuracy of neural attention codes to both discrimination accuracy and reaction time. These findings demonstrate that MEG can non-invasively capture dynamic, task-dependent fluctuations in spatial attention that parallel those observed in non-human primates. They reveal that attentional demands reshape the neural code for attention, modulate rhythmic sampling, and influence behavioral efficiency. This work bridges invasive primate and non-invasive human research and establishes MEG-based decoding of attention as a promising tool for mechanistic and clinical applications, including neurofeedback and attention-related interventions.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
25.0%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 17%
11.2%
3
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 11%
9.2%
4
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.3%
6
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
135 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.2%
7
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.2%
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 15%
3.8%
9
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.0%
10
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.6%
11
Progress in Neurobiology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
12
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
13
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 50%
2.0%
14
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 18%
2.0%
15
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
16
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.6%
17
Nature Human Behaviour
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.1%
19
Neuron
337 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
20
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.8%
22
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
24
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.6%