Back

Application of the CPER reverse genetics system for genetic engineering of rabies virus

Itakura, Y.; Kawaguchi, N.; Tabata, K.; Gonzalez, G.; Konishi, K.; Ohnuma, A.; Furuta, I.; Ito, N.; Saito, S.; Hall, W. W.; Orba, Y.; Sawa, H.; Sasaki, M.

2025-10-30 microbiology
10.1101/2025.10.22.683883 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Reverse genetics (RG) systems are essential tools for basic virological studies and applied studies using engineered recombinant viruses in various research fields. While the circular polymerase extension reaction (CPER) has been widely applied to prepare a full-length infectious complementary DNA (cDNA) of positive-sense RNA viruses, its use for negative-sense RNA viruses (mononegaviruses) remains limited. Here, we report the first CPER-based RG system for rabies virus (RABV), a member of mononegaviruses. Infectious RABV was successfully rescued from cells transfected with helper plasmids and the CPER product, the assembled overlapping DNA fragments encoding the full-length viral genome cDNA and regulatory elements. Using this system, we generated wild-type, point-mutant, reporter-expressing, and chimeric RABVs, all of which retained their expected biological properties. Deep sequencing revealed that CPER-derived viruses occasionally harbor low-frequency mutations undetectable by Sanger sequencing, highlighting PCR-related artifacts as a limitation. In addition, CPER products with a pUC19 backbone could be directly applied for E. coli transformation and cloning of RABV full genome cDNA plasmids, offering a flexible, ligase-free cloning strategy for conventional RG. Our work establishes CPER as a versatile platform for engineering recombinant RABVs, facilitating rapid generation and genetic manipulation of RABV with potential applications for research on other mononegaviruses.

Published in Journal of Virology (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.