Context-Dependent Metabolic Adaptation in Microbial Communities: From Monocultures to Complex Ecological Interactions
Burrichter, A. G.; Zimmermann, J.; Meng, C.; Ludwig, C.; Kaleta, C.; Stecher, B.
Show abstract
Microbial communities perform myriad functions in various environments, including the mammalian gut. These functions are largely based on the metabolic activity of microbial communities, which arises from the individual members contributions and their interactions. However, microbial functions and interactions are often inferred from simplified systems such as pure or pairwise cultures. Larger communities, in particular, are mainly analysed by metagenomics and the activity is deduced from the genetic potential of their community members. Although these approaches allow detailed insights into compositions, pairwise interactions and potential functions, they neglect the complexities of microbial communities, as evident in higher-order relationships, competition outcomes and the regulatory influence of environmental factors and other community members. Here, we study a mouse gut community along a gradient of complexity - from monocultures, to in vitro communities, to the mouse gut, to probe how bacteria adapt metabolically to their biotic and abiotic environments. Using metaproteomics to analyze realized bacterial niches and metabolic modeling to infer community interactions, we found that bacteria substantially modify their carbon source usage, biosynthetic activities, and protein allocation when grown in communities versus isolation. Furthermore, communities themselves adapted to their growth environment, changing in functionality as well as in the metabolic network between members. Host-associated communities isolated from the mouse gut invested in resource acquisition and utilized a broader spectrum of carbon sources, resulting in a large increase of predicted interactions between them. Our findings demonstrate the remarkable adaptability of microbes and microbial communities across environmental contexts. This underscores the critical need to study microbiomes under near-natural conditions and incorporate context-specific data into functional analyses.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Elucidating human gut microbiota interactions that robustly inhibit diverse Clostridioides difficile strains across different nutrient landscapes 97%
- Genome-centric analysis of short and long read metagenomes reveals uncharacterized microbiome diversity in Southeast Asians 96%
- Cultivation of SAR202 Bacteria from the Ocean 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Longitudinal, Multi-platform Metagenomics Yields a High-quality Genomic Catalog and Guides an In Vitro Model for Cheese Communities 96%
- Elucidation of independently modulated genes in Streptococcus pyogenes reveals carbon sources that control its expression of hemolytic toxins 95%
- A salvaging strategy enables stable metabolite provisioning among free-living bacteria 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Phosphate starvation stops bacteria digesting algal fucan that sequesters carbon 96%
- A human gut metagenome-assembled genome catalogue spanning 41 countries supports genome-scale metabolic models 96%
- Dietary- and host-derived metabolites are used by diverse gut bacteria for anaerobic respiration 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Interrogation of RNA-protein interaction dynamics in bacterial growth 95%
- Consistency across multi-omics layers in a drug-perturbed gut microbial community 93%
- Turnover and replication analysis by isotope labeling (TRAIL) reveals the influence of tissue context on protein and organelle lifetimes 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Unravelling the Core and Accessory Genome Diversity of Enterobacteriaceae in Carbon Metabolism 97%
- Long-read metagenomics of soil communities reveals phylum-specific secondary metabolite dynamics 96%
- Targeted biomass degradation by the higher termite gut system - integrative omics applied to host and its gut microbiome 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.