Back

Evaluation of submandibular gland biopsies with RT-QuIC in Parkinson's disease under investigation

Juergens-Wemheuer, W. M.; Martens, D.; Spiegel, J.; Nessis, L.; Kulas, P.; Pillong, L.; Rosar, F.; Redl, K.; Lechler, A.; Wrede, A.; Fassbender, K.; Schulz-Schaeffer, W. J.

2025-11-04 neurology
10.1101/2025.10.22.25337489 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe definite diagnosis of Parkinsons disease (PD) is usually made by the detection of -synuclein aggregates in the brain post mortem with the rare exception of some genetic forms. Traces of -synuclein aggregates in extracerebral tissue biopsies may serve as an appropriate biomarker to confirm a clinical diagnosis in vivo. ObjectivesWe set out to determine whether the detection of -synuclein aggregates in submandibular gland biopsies is an effective means for diagnosing PD patients. MethodsWe examined submandibular gland biopsies from 25 patients with PD under investigation and 25 age-matched controls to detect -synuclein aggregates using real-time quaking induced conversion (RT-QuIC) as a seed amplification-assay and immunohistochemical -synuclein aggregate detection and paraffin-embedded tissue blot (PET-blot) as confirmatory methods. ResultsOur RT-QuIC assay detected -synuclein aggregates in submandibular gland biopsies with a sensitivity of 81,1%, which increased to 90% after a clinical follow-up, and a specificity of 100%. The PET-blot with mAb5C12 confirmed 50% of the RT-QuIC positives and offered a sensitivity of 45,8% (50% after clinical follow-up) and a specificity of 100%. Immunohistochemical detection using the same antibody confirmed 28% of the RT-QuIC positives, but found two of the controls to be positive and therefore provided a sensitivity of 26,1% (28,6% after clinical follow-up) and a specificity of 92%. ConclusionsThe RT-QuIC Assay demonstrated comparable sensitivity to the clinical diagnosis (when neuropathologic examination represents the gold standard) and exhibited a similar level of specificity as the PET-blot.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.