DRIPS: Domain Randomisation for Image-based Perivascular spaces Segmentation
Bitar, L.; Diaz, M.; Duarte Coello, R.; Valdes-Hernandez, M. d. C.; Mattern, H.; Neumann, K.; Pfister, M.; Beck, C.; Mai, H. T.; Fuchs, E.; Tang, S.; Tosun, D.; Besteher, B.; Rocktäschel, T.; Reuken, P. A.; Stallmach, A.; Opel, N.; Gaser, C.; Walter, M.; Dörner, M.; Arndt, P.; Behme, D.; Piechowiak, C.; Lading, Y.; Müller, P.; Braun-Dullaeus, R.; Meuth, S. G.; Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, ; Wardlaw, J. M.; Schreiber, S.; Trujillo, M.; Düzel, E.; Ziegler, G.; Bernal, J.
Show abstract
Perivascular spaces (PVS) are emerging as sensitive imaging markers of brain health. Yet, accurate out-of-sample PVS segmentation remains challenging since existing methods are modality-specific, require dataset-specific tuning, or rely on manual labels for (re-)training. We propose DRIPS (Domain Randomisation for Image-based PVS Segmentation), a physics-inspired framework that integrates anatomical and shape priors with a physics-based image generation process to produce synthetic brain images and labels for on-the-fly deep learning model training. By introducing variability through resampling, geometric and intensity transformations, and simulated artefacts, it generalises well to real-world data. We evaluated DRIPS on MRI data from five cohorts spanning diverse health conditions (N = 165; T1w and T2w, isotropic and anisotropic imaging) and on a 3D ex vivo brain model reconstructed from histology. We evaluated its performance using the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) against manual segmentations and compared it with classical and deep learning methods, including Frangi, RORPO, SHIVA-PVS, and nnU-Net. Only DRIPS and Frangi achieved AUPRC values above chance across all cohorts and the ex vivo model. On isotropic data, DRIPS and nnU-Net performed comparably, outperforming the next-best method by a median of +0.17-0.39 AUPRC and +0.09-0.26 DSC. On anisotropic data, DRIPS outperformed all competitors by a median of +0.13-0.22 AUPRC and +0.07-0.14 DSC. Importantly, its performance was not associated with white matter hyperintensity burden. DRIPS delivers accurate, fully automated PVS segmentation across heterogeneous imaging settings, reducing the need for manual labels, modality-specific models, or cohort-dependent tuning.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep Bayesian networks for uncertainty estimation and adversarial resistance of white matter hyperintensity segmentation 98%
- Ultra-low-field paediatric MRI in low- and middle-income countries: super-resolution using a multi-orientation U-Net 98%
- CEREBRUM-7T: Fast and Fully-volumetric Brain Segmentation of 7 Tesla MR Volumes 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep Learning Based Segmentation of Brain Tissue from Diffusion MRI 97%
- Tensor Image Registration Library: Automated Deformable Registration of Stand-Alone Histology Images to Whole-Brain Post-Mortem MRI Data 96%
- Multi-parametric quantitative spinal cord MRI with unified signal readout and image denoising 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Triplanar ensemble U-Net model for white matter hyperintensities segmentation on MR images 98%
- Comparison of domain adaptation techniques for white matter hyperintensity segmentation in brain MR images 97%
- MISPEL: A supervised deep learning harmonizationmethod for multi-scanner neuroimaging data 97%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.