Demographic insights for coral restoration
Madin, J. S.; Oliver, T.; McWilliam, M.; Asbury, M.; Baird, A.; Chen, G. K.; Connolly, S. R.; Couch, C.; Drury, C.; Ehrenberg, J.; Jorissen, H.; Nims, A. D.; Reichert, J.; Rova, L.; Schiettekatte, N.; Toonen, R. J.; Wulstein, D.
Show abstract
Coral reef decline has prompted a global surge in reef restoration initiatives. The success of initiatives that aim to sustain coral populations or assemblages will depend on demographic principles. Restoration strategies generally follow two demographic pathways: additive approaches, which increase population numbers by introducing recruits, fragments, or adults without altering vital rates; and multiplicative approaches, which enhance vital rates-growth, survival, or reproduction-either extrinsically (e.g., herbivory, habitat protection) or intrinsically (e.g., assisted evolution). We synthesized 28 coral matrix population models spanning morphologically diverse coral species from the Caribbean, Hawaii, and the Great Barrier Reef to quantify additive and multiplicative changes needed to increase population growth. Results highlight two consistent demographic leverage points for which population growth was most sensitive:(1) survival of reproductive adults and (2) successful recruitment. Improving adult survival or recruitment by 20% through multiplicative means produced a 5% increase in population growth rate, depending on the fraction of the population affected. By contrast through additive means, the same population growth increases required [~]100 recruit outplants or 5-10 adult outplants per 1,000 individuals in a population annually. For large populations typical of restoration targets (105-107 individuals), this translates to 103-104 outplants per year--levels rarely logistically or economically feasible. These findings yield two key implications. First, additive interventions are inefficient for large populations and demand sustained, large-scale effort. Second, strategies enhancing vital rates across broad population segments represent the most effective means of boosting coral abundance, including habitat protection, the alleviation of environmental stressors, and interventions which promote long-term survival and recruitment.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Larval seedboxes: a modular and effective tool for scaling coral reef restoration 94%
- How far to build it before they come? Analyzing the use of the Field of Dreams hypothesis in bull kelp restoration 93%
- Optimal spatial prioritization of control resources for elimination of invasive species under demographic uncertainty 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evolution and connectivity influence the persistence and recovery of coral reefs under climate change in the Caribbean, Southwest Pacific, and Coral Triangle 96%
- Transient demographic dynamics of recovering fish populations shaped by past climate variability, harvest, and management 93%
- Marine heatwaves depress metabolic activity and impair cellular acid-base homeostasis in reef-building corals regardless of bleaching susceptibility 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.