Back

Theoretical and numerical investigation of the consistency ofmodel comparisons in pharmacometrics

Appel, L. M.; Steiert, B.

2025-10-18 systems biology
10.1101/2025.10.18.683202 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) models are essential tools in drug development, making the selection of an appropriate model critically important. When using likelihood ratio tests (LRTs) to compare nested models, it is crucial to ensure their validity, especially when parameters are fixed. This work examines the continuity of likelihood functions as a necessary condition for LRT validity within the framework of population modeling. By decomposing the Objective Function Value (OFV), we identify scenarios where parameter fixing leads to non-continuous likelihood behavior, potentially invalidating the LRT application. A proof and numerical examples illustrate that while fixing population parameters maintains continuity through compensatory behavior of terms within the OFV, fixing individual parameters introduces discontinuities. Overall, this work underscores the need for careful consideration of parameter fixation in population models: It shows that population parameters can be fixed without violating the continuity condition for LRTs and suggests that introducing covariates may provide a viable alternative for fixing in-dividual parameters. Further investigation into the sufficiency of continuity as a condition for the LRTs validity is needed.

Published in The AAPS Journal · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.