Back

Map of spiking activity underlying change detection in the mouse visual system

Bennett, C.; Gale, S. D.; Heller, G.; Ramirez, T. K.; Belski, H.; Piet, A.; Zobeiri, O.; Amster, A.; Arkhipov, A.; Cahoon, A.; Caldejon, S.; Carlson, M.; Casal, L.; Daniel, S.; Farrell, C.; Garrett, M.; Gillis, R.; Grasso, C.; Hardcastle, B.; Hytnen, R.; Johnson, T.; Ledochowitsch, P.; L'Heureux, Q.; Mastrovito, D.; McBride, E.; Mihalas, S.; Mochizuki, C.; Morrison, C.; Nayan, C.; Ngo, K.; North, K.; Ollerenshaw, D.; Ouellette, B.; Rhoads, P.; Ronellenfitch, K.; Schroedter, M.; Siegle, J. H.; Slaughterbeck, C.; Sullivan, D.; Swapp, J.; Taormina, M.; Wakeman, W.; Waughman, X.; Williford, A.; Ph

2025-10-19 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.10.17.683190 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Visual behavior requires coordinated activity across hierarchically organized brain circuits. Understanding this complexity demands datasets that are both large-scale (sampling many areas) and dense (recording many neurons in each area). Here we present a database of spiking activity across the mouse visual system--including thalamus, cortex, and midbrain--while mice perform an image change detection task. Using Neuropixels probes, we record from >75,000 high-quality units in 54 mice, mapping area-, cortical layer-, and cell type-specific coding of sensory and motor information. Modulation by task-engagement increased across the thalamocortical hierarchy but was strongest in the midbrain. Novel images modulated cortical (but not thalamic) responses through delayed recurrent activity. Population decoding and optogenetics identified a critical decision window for change detection and revealed that mice use an adaptation-based rather than image-comparison strategy. This comprehensive resource provides a valuable substrate for understanding sensorimotor computations in neural networks.

Published in Cell (predicted rank #5) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.