Back

Anionic lipids modulate mRNA-lipid nanoparticle immunogenicity and confer protection in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis

Melamed, J. R.; Muscat-Rivera, J.; Kegel, M.; Chaboub, L. S.; Perez-Tremble, R.; Bhalla, N. S.; Ni, H.; Sun, H.; Weissman, D.

2025-10-17 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.10.17.683125 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The modularity of mRNA-lipid nanoparticle (mRNA-LNP) platforms has enabled their rapid adaptation from infectious disease vaccines to emerging applications in immune-mediated disorders. However, extending mRNA-LNPs to autoimmune and inflammatory diseases requires precise control over immune cell targeting and immunogenicity. Here, we systematically investigate how incorporating anionic lipids into LNPs modulates both immune cell tropism and innate immune activation. Using a library of 40 distinct LNP formulations, we demonstrate that anionic lipids enhance mRNA delivery to splenic dendritic cells, reduce early cellular markers of adjuvant activity and tune cytokine responses in a lipid-dependent manner. We identify formulations that retain pro-inflammatory adjuvant activity and others that promote tolerogenic responses. A lead formulation containing the anionic lipid DOPG selectively dampens innate activation and induces IL-10 production. When encoding the myelin antigen MOG35-55, this LNP suppresses disease in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis, reducing neuroinflammation, T cell infiltration, and maintaining myelin morphology. These findings establish a framework for designing immune-targeted mRNA-LNPs with tunable immunogenicity and promote the development of antigen-specific tolerizing immunotherapies for autoimmune disease.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Controlled Release
○ 44 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.6%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Advanced Healthcare Materials
○ 85 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.5%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 27%
5.4%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Biomaterials
○ 84 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.8%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Advanced Therapeutics
○ 17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
Similar papers in this journal
6
ACS Nano
● 113 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.3%
7
Advanced Science
○ 286 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
8
ACS Central Science
● 71 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
9
Science Advances
● 1243 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.7%
10
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 20%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
11
Molecular Therapy
○ 81 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
12
Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids
○ 39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
13
Science Translational Medicine
● 127 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
14
Advanced Materials
○ 56 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
15
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
○ 21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
16
Nature Biomedical Engineering
○ 47 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
17
ACS Chemical Biology
● 167 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
18
Nature Nanotechnology
○ 32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
19
Advanced Functional Materials
○ 46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
20
Small
○ 78 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
21
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
● 37 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
22
Nano Letters
● 71 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
23
Biomaterials Science
● 24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
24
Biomacromolecules
● 29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
25
Bioconjugate Chemistry
● 20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
26
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
● 39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
27
Cell Reports Medicine
○ 153 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
28
Molecular Pharmaceutics
● 16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
29
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 64%
1.0%
30
Bioactive Materials
○ 20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.