Back

Mechanical thrombectomy with the Vecta 46 catheter: a safety and outcome analysis

Hutchinson, H. J.; DeYoung, C. L.; Sarathy, D.; Hey, G.; Gillam, W.; Amini, S.; Chowdhury, M. A. B.; Lucke-Wold, B.; Sorrentino, Z.; Koch, M. J.

2025-10-20 surgery
10.1101/2025.10.17.25338262 medRxiv
Show abstract

2.BackgroundThe AXS Vecta 46 intermediate catheter (Stryker) provides a large enough inner diameter to achieve effective aspiration with a small enough outer diameter and soft distal-tip flexibility to track safely through more tortuous and smaller arterial segments to non-traumatically target medium vessel occlusions. The efficacy of the Vecta 46 in the spectrum of large and medium vessel occlusions has not been well elucidated in the literature. MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent MT for acute ischemic stroke at the University of Florida between July 2022 and June 2024. The outcomes of patients treated with the Vecta 46 was compared to that of all other catheters used at the institution. ResultsThe distribution of aspiration and stent retriever attempts in Vecta 46 procedures versus non-Vecta 46 procedures was significantly different (p = 0.00325). Aspiration was attempted 1.66 {+/-} 0.936 times in the Vecta 46 group and 1.12 {+/-} 0.650 times in the non-Vecta 46 group (p = 0.00135). More mechanical thrombectomies with the Vecta 46 included aspiration of a secondary thrombus (p = 0.0314), despite no difference in distribution of primary or secondary occlusion location. There were no statistically significant differences in recanalization success (p = 0.800), recanalization time (p = 0.245), procedure duration (p = 0.580), discharge modified Rankin Score (p = 0.875), or intracranial hemorrhage rate (p = 0.720) between non-Vecta 46 and Vecta 46 procedures. ConclusionsVecta 46 has similar safety and functional outcomes compared to other endovascular treatment options despite procedural differences.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
38.0%
2
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
12.6%
50% of probability mass above
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.6%
4
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.0%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.1%
6
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.3%
7
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
8
Stroke
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
9
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
10
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
11
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
12
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
13
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
14
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
15
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
16
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
17
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
18
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
19
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
20
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
21
Transfusion
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.5%
22
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.5%